Why water-cooled?

Jim Newell wrote:

> Why are smaller outboard motors water-cooled?
>
> I am thinking 5 - 9 HP engines.
>
> I understand why inboard, inboard/outboard, and larger outboards are
> water-cooled; but why are smaller outboard engines water-cooled as well?

> Wouldn't air-cooling be simpler?

Simpler, yes, but not my much - outboard water pumps are pretty simple
IME. And air cooled engines are nowhere near as efficient. Air cooled
engines are forced to run richer to maintain low enough combustion
temperatures under heavy loads and high ambient temps. More fuel use,
more emissions. Sitting out on the water, why *wouldn't* you water cool
an engine?

Keith Hughes
 >> Stay informed about: Why water-cooled? 

I was around when a lot of small outboards were air cooled. The
disadvantage can be summarized in one word.....NOISE. The water in the
exhaust helps to quiet the bark of the combustion.

>
 >> Stay informed about: Why water-cooled? 

Keith,

>.....why *wouldn't* you water cool an engine?

Good question, and the answer is that my original question ultimatley ends
up trying to answer the bigger question.....

With boat motors, even small ones costing so much money, why are there not
more conversions out there running an older functional lower unit, and some
sort of lawn/vertical Briggs or Techumse engine.

.....I know that over time, this question has been beat to death! ....but
there is always a "catch" in life, and the motor is becomming the "catch" in
this case that cuts me out of participation.



"Keith Hughes" <keithahughes.DeleteThis@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:D%zxf.55$6N2.5721@news.uswest.net...
>
>
> Jim Newell wrote:
>
>> Why are smaller outboard motors water-cooled?
>>
>> I am thinking 5 - 9 HP engines.
>>
>> I understand why inboard, inboard/outboard, and larger outboards are
>> water-cooled; but why are smaller outboard engines water-cooled as well?
>
>> Wouldn't air-cooling be simpler?
>
> Simpler, yes, but not my much - outboard water pumps are pretty simple
> IME. And air cooled engines are nowhere near as efficient. Air cooled
> engines are forced to run richer to maintain low enough combustion
> temperatures under heavy loads and high ambient temps. More fuel use, more
> emissions. Sitting out on the water, why *wouldn't* you water cool an
> engine?
>
> Keith Hughes
 >> Stay informed about: Why water-cooled? 

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:32:13 GMT, "Jim Newell" <jfnewell RemoveThis @jfnewell.com>
wrote:

>....I know that over time, this question has been beat to death! ....but
>there is always a "catch" in life, and the motor is becomming the "catch" in
>this case that cuts me out of participation.

================

There are lots of used outboards out there for reasonable prices.

And then there is rec.boats.paddle, totally free, very enviro friendly
and good excercise.

Air cooled motor conversions are an abomination: Noisy, no rust
resistance and vibration.
 >> Stay informed about: Why water-cooled? 

Jim,

> Keith,

>>.....why *wouldn't* you water cool an engine?
>
>
> Good question, and the answer is that my original question ultimatley ends
> up trying to answer the bigger question.....

But the 'bigger question' seems to be "why not use a gas guzzling, high
polluting, incredibly noisy engine with questionable reliability since
the *initial* cost is lower?". The *only* thing the old air cooled
outboards had going for them (and this relates directly to a Briggs or
Tecumseh as well) was lower purchase price.

Back when the world was young, I did some kart and mini-bike racing, and
I've "rebuilt" quite a few Briggs and Tecumseh motors. Unless they've
changed significantly, they are basically disposable in design. Single
piston ring, no rod or wrist-pin bearings, non-sleaveable
non-replaceable jug, things like that. They would be difficult to
"marine-ize" (adding additional cost as well), and the reliability is
just not there.

As someone else posted, look for a deal on a used outboard. From a
reliability perspective, you'd be better off with a 10 year old outboard
(with some minor servicing) than you would with a brand new B&S or
Tecumseh conversion. Remember, you still have to have the shaft casing,
waterproof gear box, shafts, propeller, etc., all of which are going to
add more cost than the B&S or Tecumseh itself.

Good luck!

Keith Hughes
 >> Stay informed about: Why water-cooled? 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Why water-cooled? 

"Keith Hughes" <keithahughes.TakeThisOut@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:VLPxf.20$8t3.2221@news.uswest.net...
> From a reliability perspective, you'd be better off with a 10 year old
> outboard (with some minor servicing) than you would with a brand new B&S
> or Tecumseh conversion.

In my experience, you'll do better with a 30-40 year old outboard, not to
mention a 10 year old used engine. Those '60s and '70s Johnsons and
Evinrudes are plenty reliable and parts are available.

Ed
 >> Stay informed about: Why water-cooled? 

apart from all the good arguments raised here so far, water cooling
allows for a more consistent temperature when hot, and less difference
between cold and hot. This is important because we are dealing with
metals here, most of which expand as they get hotter. Air cooled
engines typically require bigger 'gaps' between most moving parts,
especially the piston and bore which reduces performance by a lot when
cold, and still a bit when hot. It also allows fuel/oil to flow past
and into the case where it wont do much good. Water cooled engines can
typically run much tighter tollerances almost everywhere which results
in a longer lasting better performing machine.
 >> Stay informed about: Why water-cooled? 

Jim Newell wrote:
> OK....
>
> I have listened to the discusion from both sides.
>
> For this season, I am going to repair the Force 85. (I know, I should throw
> it away, and get a decent engine that costs $7,000 - $8,000, but that is not
> going to happen!)
>
> For the future, since I have the tools to make it happen, I will "play" with
> the idea, and see what comes of it.
>
> (Keith...I will experiment outside of your marina!)
>
>
> "Jim Newell" <jfnewell.DeleteThis@jfnewell.com> wrote in message
> news:Z8zxf.805$1J1.249@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> > Why are smaller outboard motors water-cooled?
> >
> >
> >
> > I am thinking 5 - 9 HP engines.
> >
> >
> >
> > I understand why inboard, inboard/outboard, and larger outboards are
> > water-cooled; but why are smaller outboard engines water-cooled as well?
> >
> >
> >
> > Wouldn't air-cooling be simpler?
> >
> >
 >> Stay informed about: Why water-cooled? 

OK....

I have listened to the discusion from both sides.

For this season, I am going to repair the Force 85. (I know, I should throw
it away, and get a decent engine that costs $7,000 - $8,000, but that is not
going to happen!)

For the future, since I have the tools to make it happen, I will "play" with
the idea, and see what comes of it.

(Keith...I will experiment outside of your marina!)


"Jim Newell" <jfnewell.TakeThisOut@jfnewell.com> wrote in message
news:Z8zxf.805$1J1.249@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> Why are smaller outboard motors water-cooled?
>
>
>
> I am thinking 5 - 9 HP engines.
>
>
>
> I understand why inboard, inboard/outboard, and larger outboards are
> water-cooled; but why are smaller outboard engines water-cooled as well?
>
>
>
> Wouldn't air-cooling be simpler?
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Why water-cooled?