Someone put a dime in the meter over there

Mike wrote:
> It may have been you, but someone suggested that Harry, JimmyH, and Donny be
> the moderators.
>
> I think that's a great idea, then we could just watch them jerk each other
> off, since that's all that would be happening over there.
>
> --Mike
>

Actually, being the group jerk-off would be a good job for you. You seem
to do it a lot.

On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 17:51:04 -0700, "Mike" <mgg DeleteThis @pakbel.net> wrote:

>It may have been you, but someone suggested that Harry, JimmyH, and Donny be
>the moderators.
>
>I think that's a great idea, then we could just watch them jerk each other
>off, since that's all that would be happening over there.
>
>--Mike
>
>"John H." <salmonbait DeleteThis @removegmail.com> wrote in message
>news:c4tq645tgjh0c8t9ufs06htehi2ujo4slo@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:17:10 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
>> <email DeleteThis @swsportsremove.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:54:31 -0700 (PDT),
>>>justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Jul 3, 7:25 pm, "Jim" <j... DeleteThis @boatnet.net> wrote:
>>>>> It's melting away. Check it out.
>>>
>>>>Nothing personal, and I admit I don't like this Gould sockpuppet, but
>>>>I knew he couldn't do it. Moderation, is for moderates.
>>>
>>>I knew it was going to happen and I even told Chuck so. It's not that
>>>Chuck isn't capable of moderating, but his dream was to have a lightly
>>>moderated forum in which everybody got along with the occasional spat
>>>that would dissolve quickly. It's a very "New Age" approach to forum
>>>moderating and doesn't work worth a damn because of three members in
>>>particular just couldn't drop what went on here and dragged it over
>>>there.
>>>
>>>Secondarily, it was too easy to just drop down to the last fifty posts
>>>which compacted the latest activity and became the defacto forum
>>>without reference to the various thread categories. I could have told
>>>Chuck that would happen too - been there, done that.
>>>
>>>Thirdly (thirdly?), he shouldn't have even gone with an off topic
>>>thread category - told him that too.
>>>
>>>Chuck wanted it to go his way and it didn't. He's also stubborn
>>>because this was evident two months ago shortly after he got it up and
>>>running, but he kept hoping. Instead of banning people or barring
>>>them for a day, three days, week, month, he deleted the posts and that
>>>never works.
>>>
>>>He had the resources if he only asked for some advice before he set it
>>>up and gotten some advice from former moderators who have been through
>>>the wars.
>>>
>>>Chuck needs to be the last court of appeal for the actions of a
>>>moderator or maybe two moderators who become the bad guys. That way he
>>>can isolate himself from his group and act as a "El Supremo Grande"
>>>when complaints come flying. He doesn't even have to be personally
>>>involved - he can read through the posts and give instructions to the
>>>moderators if there is something that he doens't like.
>>
>> I gave Chuck an idea for a couple moderators. He didn't like it, I guess,
>> 'cause he deleted the post.
>

I forgot to include Donnie. But that'd be OK.