I don't know about four strokes but two strokes must be rolled over in
the proper direction or water goes back into the engine. I imagine it is
somewhat similar with four strokes only it would come back in through
the valves. It doesn't take much to hydrolock a motor and four strokes
are going to be more sensitive because of all the moving parts. Now, I
would like to know how Kawasaki came to this determination versus a
defect in assembly. I don't believe there is a flaw since there are
quite a few four strokes out there that are running fine over long
periods of time but if you don't get the water out of a motor, it will
destroy itself over time - sometimes almost instantly, other times it
takes a few hours.
Tom
Kjell Martin wrote:
> Anyone else experience engine failure that Kawasaki blames on water in the
> engine type of hydrolock? I just hit 10 hours on the engine when the 4
> stroke engine failed.
> It had been rolled once about hour 5. We checked the engine compartment for
> water.
> I'm just testing the waters to see if there is a flaw that Kawasaki isn't
> owning up to.
> thanks,
> K
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: hydrolock on Kawasaki