 |
|
 |
|
Next: Three Cheers for Shimano
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jul 11, 2007 Posts: 225
|
(Msg. 46) Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 2:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: rec>boats>cruising, others (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:42:17 -0000, "jim.isbell"
<jim.isbell.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Ah well, another great idea skuppered by dat old devil science
>>
>> Bruce in Bangkok
>> (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom)
>
>
>A 32' column of water is a continuous vacuum pump. As long as you put
>water (salt water) into the column it will pull down and keep a vacuum
>in the top of the column. The fresh water distills off the top of the
>saltwater column then migrates as steam to the other side and distills
>in the fresh water side....also creating a vacuum. You draw off the
>fresh water on one side and pump salt water into the other side. The
>salt water side is painted black to absorb sun heat and the fresh
>water side is painted white to reflect the suns heat. You only need a
>few degrees difference for distillation and the vacuum creates the
>boiling at low temperatures...even ice will change state to steam in a
>vacuum. The idea works.
>
>In a practical sense, I would use soft tubing for the sides and a
>solid "U" shaped piece of copper tubing for the top center with a ring
>soldered to it so it could be hoisted up the mast of a sailboat. It
>would take a 30 to 40 foot mast to do the job. The bottom end of the
>salt water tube could go to a through hull for a continuous supply of
>salt water and the bottom end of the fresh water tube could go to a
>small pump to remove the water without breaking the vacuum.
What you describe is just a still, and a 32 ft inverted U will change
nothing. Solar stills are not new. A very tall boiler connected to a
very tall condenser is all you describe.
Why don't you build one and let us know just how it is superior to any
other solar still, especially ones without all the windage and
topweight.
By the way, it takes about 1100 BTU's evaporate a pound of water, and
this does not vary with pressure. How much sunlight is your still
going to intercept? Sunlight is a maximum of about 1400 watts per sq
meter, or, according to the 'calculator that takes no prisoners', the
HP48, about one eighth of a BTU /sq ft/sec.
Something like half a pound of water evaporated per hour, per sq ft.
This assumes that the collector is squarely aimed at the sun, at all
times. What you want is the largest possible shadow. A rectangle 1 in
by 32 ft is about 2,66 sq ft., by the way. A tube is not a very
efficient shape for a solar collector, of course, but it simplifies
aiming it, since a vertical cylinder looks the same from every
horizontal angle. Your vertical tube will face the sun nice and square
at sunrise and sunset.
Casady >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 11, 2007 Posts: 225
|
(Msg. 47) Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:57:27 -0500, Brian Whatcott
<betwys1.RemoveThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>(That would however take a hand pump capable of supplying a flow
>at 15 psi plus. Like a bicycle pump, or better? )
Grease guns are, some of them, capable of at least. hundreds of psi.
I happen to own a 0-5000 psi gauge. Bought it to check tractor
hydralic systems. I forget just what a grease gun pumped it up to, but
it was a lot.
There is a reverse osmosis watermaker intended for liferaft use, with
a hand pump, and RO takes hundreds of psi. That is what you want, if
you actually need high pressure.
Casady >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 22, 2003 Posts: 434
|
(Msg. 48) Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:40:57 GMT, richardcasady.DeleteThis@earthlink.net (Richard
Casady) wrote:
>>(That would however take a hand pump capable of supplying a flow
>>at 15 psi plus. Like a bicycle pump, or better? )
>Grease guns are, some of them, capable of at least. hundreds of psi.
>I happen to own a 0-5000 psi gauge. Bought it to check tractor
>hydraulic systems. I forget just what a grease gun pumped it up to, but
>it was a lot.
>There is a reverse osmosis watermaker intended for liferaft use, with
>a hand pump, and RO takes hundreds of psi. That is what you want, if
>you actually need high pressure.
>
>Casady
How interesting! Sure enough, a grease gun can usually put up 1000's
of psi. and a low volume RO with such a hand pump seems like a
reasonably economic proposition. Wonder how much they cost.
Must take a look!
Brian W >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 22, 2003 Posts: 434
|
(Msg. 49) Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:40:57 GMT, richardcasady DeleteThis @earthlink.net (Richard
Casady) wrote:
>There is a reverse osmosis watermaker intended for liferaft use, with
>a hand pump, and RO takes hundreds of psi. That is what you want, if
>you actually need high pressure.
>
>Casady
I looked up an example
The Katadyn Survivor 35 hand pumped was formerly
called the PUR Survivor 35 RO.
At 30 strokes/minute for 1.2 gall/hr - it costs $1500.
Not cheap.
Volume production ought to bring that down a bit?
Brian W >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 22, 2007 Posts: 11
|
(Msg. 50) Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dear Richard Casady:
"Richard Casady" <richardcasady.RemoveThis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4708b826.1572631640@news.east.earthlink.net...
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:57:27 -0500, Brian Whatcott
> <betwys1.RemoveThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>(That would however take a hand pump capable
>>of supplying a flow at 15 psi plus. Like a bicycle
>>pump, or better? )
>
> Grease guns are, some of them, capable of at
> least. hundreds of psi. I happen to own a 0-5000
> psi gauge. Bought it to check tractor hydralic
> systems. I forget just what a grease gun pumped
> it up to, but it was a lot.
But it was a *very* low flow rate. Brian is talking about "a
few" gallons per minute, to use cooler salt water in a tube on
the "fresh water" side to help carry off waste heat. And it is
going upwards a few tens of feet (then back down), perhaps
starting at atmospheric pressure. It would be hard work,
especially it it had to be kept up for an hour!
> There is a reverse osmosis watermaker
> intended for liferaft use, with a hand pump, and
> RO takes hundreds of psi. That is what you want,
> if you actually need high pressure.
I figure you probably can buy a small hand-held "single-shot"
pocket RO unit for just such a purpose...
David A. Smith >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 22, 2003 Posts: 434
|
(Msg. 51) Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 6:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:59:39 -0700, Keith Hughes
<keithahughes.RemoveThis@qwest.net> wrote:
>> My, my: "it's just plain wrong": he said a column of 32 ft,
>
>Uhmmm, no, he said a "32' column of water". Can you see the difference?
Hmmm..Priestley certainly could. His water barometer had a water
column round 32 or 33 ft high.
How 'bout that!
>Gee, I didn't know you were using 'smart' molecules that travel *only*
>in the direction you want them too.
.....
>Keith Hughes
>
Ho, hum: if half of them go in the wrong direction
until their first collision, it must take them a really, really,
REALLY long time to diffuse through the water vapor/rarified air mix!
Brian W >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 23, 2003 Posts: 33
|
(Msg. 52) Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 6:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Brian Whatcott wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:59:39 -0700, Keith Hughes
> <keithahughes DeleteThis @qwest.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> My, my: "it's just plain wrong": he said a column of 32 ft,
>> Uhmmm, no, he said a "32' column of water". Can you see the difference?
>
> Hmmm..Priestley certainly could. His water barometer had a water
> column round 32 or 33 ft high.
> How 'bout that!
Quite true, which probably engenders the confusion. However, the
barometer *starts* with an evacuated column. That's how the atmospheric
pressure can push the water 32' up the column - you have 14.7 PSIA to
work with to lift the water. Same for a mercury barometer, or a McCleod
gauge, etc.
Different story than using the water column to *generate* the vacuum.
>
>> Gee, I didn't know you were using 'smart' molecules that travel *only*
>> in the direction you want them too.
> ....
>> Keith Hughes
>>
>
>
> Ho, hum: if half of them go in the wrong direction
> until their first collision, it must take them a really, really,
> REALLY long time to diffuse through the water vapor/rarified air mix!
>
Half? More likely 99.99999++% of them will not be traveling parallel to
the axis of the column. Half of those that *are*, are going in the wrong
direction.
How difficult this type of mass transport actually is can be seen by
looking at flow rates for water vapor from lyophilizer chambers to the
condensers (yes, I have done this a lot). Putting a 90° bend in the tube
connecting the chamber (where the ice sits on heated shelves) and the
condenser roughly (very roughly, given the variability of other design
factors) cuts the flow rate in half. That's in a 48" ID tube too! And
pulling vacuum through the condenser to maintain 50-100 microbar
pressure - i.e. maintaining a significant delta-P from chamber to
condenser. And with condenser coils maintained at -65°C.
It may seem counterintuitive, but the molecular motion you referenced
just *causes* the pressure, while providing little impetus for mass
transfer from point A to point B. And once the pressure reaches
equilibrium throughout the system, you have to rely virtually entirely
on diffusion, which is much, much slower.
Keith Hughes >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 11, 2007 Posts: 225
|
(Msg. 53) Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:59:39 -0700, Keith Hughes
<keithahughes.DeleteThis@qwest.net> wrote:
>Gee, I didn't know you were using 'smart' molecules that travel *only*
>in the direction you want them too. And they don't bump into each other
>in the process. Wow, that's really neat, how did you accomplish that?
I noticed that.
Isn't the speed of sound, whatever it is, what it is because it _is _
the molecular speed? They both vary with temperature but not pressure.
Casady >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 28, 2006 Posts: 1028
|
(Msg. 54) Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:43:02 -0500, Brian Whatcott
<betwys1.DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:40:57 GMT, richardcasady.DeleteThis@earthlink.net (Richard
>Casady) wrote:
>
>
>>There is a reverse osmosis watermaker intended for liferaft use, with
>>a hand pump, and RO takes hundreds of psi. That is what you want, if
>>you actually need high pressure.
>>
>>Casady
>
>
>I looked up an example
>The Katadyn Survivor 35 hand pumped was formerly
>called the PUR Survivor 35 RO.
>At 30 strokes/minute for 1.2 gall/hr - it costs $1500.
>
Calorie expenditure by the survivor(s) could be a problem here.
The strokes for this RO unit can probably be performed by devising a
simple hydraulic pump to move gears, cams, and levers.
The pump cylinder itself would probably need an inverted U tube with
legs perhaps 32' or 33' long.
An initial vacuum might be applied to the top of the U-tube by using a
fitting that can be connected to the PUR Survivor 35 RO.
Once the water starts flowing through the vane at one end of the U
tube, and the vane shaft is turning the gears, cams and levers will be
clacking way, running that PUR unit on auto, good as gold.
After that it's all gravy until you have to change the membrane.
In the meantime you can spend your time fishing until rescued.
--Vic >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 23, 2003 Posts: 33
|
(Msg. 55) Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Vic Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:43:02 -0500, Brian Whatcott
> <betwys1 DeleteThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:40:57 GMT, richardcasady DeleteThis @earthlink.net (Richard
>> Casady) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> There is a reverse osmosis watermaker intended for liferaft use, with
>>> a hand pump, and RO takes hundreds of psi. That is what you want, if
>>> you actually need high pressure.
>>>
>>> Casady
>>
>> I looked up an example
>> The Katadyn Survivor 35 hand pumped was formerly
>> called the PUR Survivor 35 RO.
>> At 30 strokes/minute for 1.2 gall/hr - it costs $1500.
>>
> Calorie expenditure by the survivor(s) could be a problem here.
Oh yeah, right. Now you want to survive also. Geez, what next?
> The strokes for this RO unit can probably be performed by devising a
> simple hydraulic pump to move gears, cams, and levers.
> The pump cylinder itself would probably need an inverted U tube with
> legs perhaps 32' or 33' long.
> An initial vacuum might be applied to the top of the U-tube by using a
> fitting that can be connected to the PUR Survivor 35 RO.
> Once the water starts flowing through the vane at one end of the U
> tube, and the vane shaft is turning the gears, cams and levers will be
> clacking way, running that PUR unit on auto, good as gold.
> After that it's all gravy until you have to change the membrane.
> In the meantime you can spend your time fishing until rescued.
Sounds like perpetual motion to me, but I'm having a hard time
envisioning what you're describing above.
Keith Hughes >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 11, 2007 Posts: 225
|
(Msg. 56) Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:55 am
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:44:35 -0700, Keith Hughes
<keithahughes.TakeThisOut@qwest.net> wrote:
>Sounds like perpetual motion to me, but I'm having a hard time
>envisioning what you're describing above.
Of course you are, since it is basically nonsense. No mention of where
the energy comes from.
Casady >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 11, 2007 Posts: 225
|
(Msg. 57) Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:55 am
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:38:17 -0500, Vic Smith
<thismailautodeleted RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote:
>The strokes for this RO unit can probably be performed by devising a
>simple hydraulic pump to move gears, cams, and levers.
It comes with a simple hydraulic pump. I fail to see where adding
complicated machinery, with no power source whatever, will be of any
benefit.
Casady >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 22, 2007 Posts: 11
|
(Msg. 58) Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:14 am
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dear Richard Casady:
"Richard Casady" <richardcasady RemoveThis @earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:47093cad.33079812@news.east.earthlink.net...
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:44:35 -0700, Keith Hughes
> <keithahughes RemoveThis @qwest.net> wrote:
>
>>Sounds like perpetual motion to me, but I'm
>>having a hard time envisioning what you're
>>describing above.
>
> Of course you are, since it is basically nonsense.
> No mention of where the energy comes from.
Links were provided. "waste heat" (from what process?) and / or
"solar heat" have been cited so far. All the vacuum does is move
boiling temperature closer to ambient. Making more common
materials suitable for this application.
David A. Smith >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 23, 2003 Posts: 33
|
(Msg. 59) Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:38 am
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
> Dear Richard Casady:
>
> "Richard Casady" <richardcasady.RemoveThis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:47093cad.33079812@news.east.earthlink.net...
>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:44:35 -0700, Keith Hughes
>> <keithahughes.RemoveThis@qwest.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds like perpetual motion to me, but I'm
>>> having a hard time envisioning what you're
>>> describing above.
>> Of course you are, since it is basically nonsense.
>> No mention of where the energy comes from.
>
> Links were provided. "waste heat" (from what process?) and / or
> "solar heat" have been cited so far. All the vacuum does is move
> boiling temperature closer to ambient. Making more common
> materials suitable for this application.
>
> David A. Smith
Sorry David, I think you lost track of the posting train here. Richard
was responding to *my* response to the following post from "Vic":
"Calorie expenditure by the survivor(s) could be a problem here.
The strokes for this RO unit can probably be performed by devising a
simple hydraulic pump to move gears, cams, and levers.
The pump cylinder itself would probably need an inverted U tube with
legs perhaps 32' or 33' long.
An initial vacuum might be applied to the top of the U-tube by using a
fitting that can be connected to the PUR Survivor 35 RO.
Once the water starts flowing through the vane at one end of the U
tube, and the vane shaft is turning the gears, cams and levers will be
clacking way, running that PUR unit on auto, good as gold.
After that it's all gravy until you have to change the membrane.
In the meantime you can spend your time fishing until rescued."
Which appears to be a reference to a perpetual motion machine with no
energy source. Nothing whatsoever to do with the vacuum distillation
discussion.
Keith Hughes >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 22, 2007 Posts: 11
|
(Msg. 60) Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Potable Water - The Third Way. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dear jim.isbell:
"jim.isbell" <jim.isbell RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1191179636.430473.28350@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> I give up. My Masters degree in Physics is of
> no value here. My Bachelors degree in Math
> is of no value here. My 20 years with the
> university (retired) means nothing. Someone
> with an opinion (however false) instead of facts
> of physical science, seems to be more able to
> swing the belief of the uninformed.
Someone with this much experience must know that the ignorant
will always trample the carpet of wisdom. Why do you waste your
time responding to them?
The entire comedy is misinterpretation of wording, and argument
about strawmen. Relax and have what is left of a weekend. For
they (in this case) are as right as you are... just about
different things.
David A. Smith >> Stay informed about: Potable Water - The Third Way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Internal Fiberglass potable water tank repair - I've got a tiny hairline crack in an integral fiberglass water tank that I need to repair. So far, folks have suggested epoxy, JB weld, polyester resin, etc., but no concensus has appeared. Any suggestions? Any reason not to use aquarium type silicone..
Why water-cooled? - Why are smaller outboard motors water-cooled? I am thinking 5 - 9 HP engines. I understand why inboard, inboard/outboard, and larger outboards are water-cooled; but why are smaller outboard engines water-cooled as well? Wouldn't air-cooling be....
Water exhaust - I just recently obtained an old Evinrude 6 HP Fisherman outboard. Anyone know where the cooling water is supposed to exit from this machine? Thanks, BS
I have my boat in the water - I haven't been on this bullletin board for a while but I launched my 27 foot trailer-sailer in July and it has taken me until Thanksgiving to get some of the pictures on my website. This is the site of the launching and a couple of picture of "Red&q...
Getting the boat to the water - I started planning from day one on how to get Rutu out of the back yard and over to Savannah but here is boat moving problem that puts mine to shame. A 110' 200 passenger ship being moved to Lake George, NY through downtown Ticonderoga at 1/10th MPH.... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|