In case nobody noticed........

> "HK" <payer33859.RemoveThis@mypacks.net> wrote in message
> news:63iiuvF27b1cmU1@mid.individual.net...

>> Tim wrote:
>>>
>>> It would be nice if everyone called a permanent truce, but that wont
>>> happen.



>> Why don't you see what you can do to persuade Reggie, Loogie, Dan, and a
>> few of the other snarks to behave?
>>
>> I'll be glad to follow your lead.


Why not try a new concept?
*Be* the leader.

Eisboch
 >> Stay informed about: In case nobody noticed........ 

On Mar 9, 8:48 pm, John H. <jherringnumerical....DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:28:21 -0700 (PDT), justwaitafrekinmin....DeleteThis@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Mar 9, 4:07 pm, Tim <tschna....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 9, 12:33 pm, justwaitafrekinmin....DeleteThis@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> > On Mar 9, 12:45 pm, Tim <tschna....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > On Mar 9, 11:41 am, HK <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
>
> >> > > > Tim wrote:
> >> > > > > On Mar 9, 9:05 am, HK <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
> >> > > > >> Wayne.B wrote:
> >> > > > >>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:40:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
> >> > > > >>> <chuckgould.ch....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>> Pretty soon, it would become apparent that if you
> >> > > > >>>> chose not to participate in the fighting and arguing there would be
> >> > > > >>>> very little else to do. That's where I'm at. When it got so bad that
> >> > > > >>>> it was actually embarrassing to be associated with this group it was
> >> > > > >>>> time to go. Getting sucked into the vortex once in a while was
> >> > > > >>>> additionally alarming.
> >> > > > >>> As always, Chuck makes some good points.  Too bad that very few are
> >> > > > >>> listening.
> >> > > > >> Does that mean you are going to put a lid on your snarky comments?
>
> >> > > > > Harry, in all fairness are you going to put a lid on all your
> >> > > > > political (biased, or un-biased) threads?
>
> >> > > > My "political" posts for the most part do not personally attack anyone here.
>
> >> > > > If there were some interesting boating content in this newsgroup....
> >> > > > But there isn't. And attempts to start some posts almost invariably end
> >> > > > up being attacked by the snarks.
>
> >> > > > Perhaps you might want to query the snarks to see if they plan to stop.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> > > It would be nice if everyone called a permanent truce, but that wont
> >> > > happen.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> > HEY TIM!! Thanks for the email. simple and laugh out loud funny.. !- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> ?:^)- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >You did not send it. I got a cartoon in the email, addressed from you,
> >to me and two other members of the list. Based on the content, I
> >assumed you had actually sent it, guess someone was testing my
> >email... You did not sent the "peanuts" cartoon??
>
> I love Peanuts!
> --
> John- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

As long as they are not free;) I take it you got the memo:O
 >> Stay informed about: In case nobody noticed........ 

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:28:21 -0700 (PDT), justwaitafrekinminute.DeleteThis@gmail.com
wrote:

>On Mar 9, 4:07 pm, Tim <tschna....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 9, 12:33 pm, justwaitafrekinmin....DeleteThis@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Mar 9, 12:45 pm, Tim <tschna....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Mar 9, 11:41 am, HK <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > > Tim wrote:
>> > > > > On Mar 9, 9:05 am, HK <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
>> > > > >> Wayne.B wrote:
>> > > > >>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:40:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
>> > > > >>> <chuckgould.ch....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >>>> Pretty soon, it would become apparent that if you
>> > > > >>>> chose not to participate in the fighting and arguing there would be
>> > > > >>>> very little else to do. That's where I'm at. When it got so bad that
>> > > > >>>> it was actually embarrassing to be associated with this group it was
>> > > > >>>> time to go. Getting sucked into the vortex once in a while was
>> > > > >>>> additionally alarming.
>> > > > >>> As always, Chuck makes some good points.  Too bad that very few are
>> > > > >>> listening.
>> > > > >> Does that mean you are going to put a lid on your snarky comments?
>>
>> > > > > Harry, in all fairness are you going to put a lid on all your
>> > > > > political (biased, or un-biased) threads?
>>
>> > > > My "political" posts for the most part do not personally attack anyone here.
>>
>> > > > If there were some interesting boating content in this newsgroup...
>> > > > But there isn't. And attempts to start some posts almost invariably end
>> > > > up being attacked by the snarks.
>>
>> > > > Perhaps you might want to query the snarks to see if they plan to stop.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > > > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> > > It would be nice if everyone called a permanent truce, but that wont
>> > > happen.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> > HEY TIM!! Thanks for the email. simple and laugh out loud funny.. !- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> ?:^)- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>You did not send it. I got a cartoon in the email, addressed from you,
>to me and two other members of the list. Based on the content, I
>assumed you had actually sent it, guess someone was testing my
>email... You did not sent the "peanuts" cartoon??

I love Peanuts!
--
John
 >> Stay informed about: In case nobody noticed........ 

HK wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>> On Mar 9, 11:41 am, HK <payer33....RemoveThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>> Tim wrote:
>>>> On Mar 9, 9:05 am, HK <payer33....RemoveThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>>>> Wayne.B wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:40:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
>>>>>> <chuckgould.ch....RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Pretty soon, it would become apparent that if you
>>>>>>> chose not to participate in the fighting and arguing there would be
>>>>>>> very little else to do. That's where I'm at. When it got so bad that
>>>>>>> it was actually embarrassing to be associated with this group it was
>>>>>>> time to go. Getting sucked into the vortex once in a while was
>>>>>>> additionally alarming.
>>>>>> As always, Chuck makes some good points. Too bad that very few are
>>>>>> listening.
>>>>> Does that mean you are going to put a lid on your snarky comments?
>>>> Harry, in all fairness are you going to put a lid on all your
>>>> political (biased, or un-biased) threads?
>>> My "political" posts for the most part do not personally attack
>>> anyone here.
>>>
>>> If there were some interesting boating content in this newsgroup...
>>> But there isn't. And attempts to start some posts almost invariably end
>>> up being attacked by the snarks.
>>>
>>> Perhaps you might want to query the snarks to see if they plan to
>>> stop.- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> It would be nice if everyone called a permanent truce, but that wont
>> happen.
> \
>
> Why don't you see what you can do to persuade Reggie, Loogie, Dan, and a
> few of the other snarks to behave?
>
> I'll be glad to follow your lead.
>

I'm invisible to you Harry. Don't drag me into your lame spin.
 >> Stay informed about: In case nobody noticed........ 

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:59:02 -0700 (PDT), justwaitafrekinminute.TakeThisOut@gmail.com
wrote:

>On Mar 9, 8:48 pm, John H. <jherringnumerical....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:28:21 -0700 (PDT), justwaitafrekinmin....TakeThisOut@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Mar 9, 4:07 pm, Tim <tschna....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Mar 9, 12:33 pm, justwaitafrekinmin....TakeThisOut@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Mar 9, 12:45 pm, Tim <tschna....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > On Mar 9, 11:41 am, HK <payer33....TakeThisOut@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > Tim wrote:
>> >> > > > > On Mar 9, 9:05 am, HK <payer33....TakeThisOut@mypacks.net> wrote:
>> >> > > > >> Wayne.B wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:40:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
>> >> > > > >>> <chuckgould.ch....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > >>>> Pretty soon, it would become apparent that if you
>> >> > > > >>>> chose not to participate in the fighting and arguing there would be
>> >> > > > >>>> very little else to do. That's where I'm at. When it got so bad that
>> >> > > > >>>> it was actually embarrassing to be associated with this group it was
>> >> > > > >>>> time to go. Getting sucked into the vortex once in a while was
>> >> > > > >>>> additionally alarming.
>> >> > > > >>> As always, Chuck makes some good points.  Too bad that very few are
>> >> > > > >>> listening.
>> >> > > > >> Does that mean you are going to put a lid on your snarky comments?
>>
>> >> > > > > Harry, in all fairness are you going to put a lid on all your
>> >> > > > > political (biased, or un-biased) threads?
>>
>> >> > > > My "political" posts for the most part do not personally attack anyone here.
>>
>> >> > > > If there were some interesting boating content in this newsgroup...
>> >> > > > But there isn't. And attempts to start some posts almost invariably end
>> >> > > > up being attacked by the snarks.
>>
>> >> > > > Perhaps you might want to query the snarks to see if they plan to stop.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> > > > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> > > It would be nice if everyone called a permanent truce, but that wont
>> >> > > happen.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> > > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> > HEY TIM!! Thanks for the email. simple and laugh out loud funny.. !- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> ?:^)- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >You did not send it. I got a cartoon in the email, addressed from you,
>> >to me and two other members of the list. Based on the content, I
>> >assumed you had actually sent it, guess someone was testing my
>> >email... You did not sent the "peanuts" cartoon??
>>
>> I love Peanuts!
>> --
>> John- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>As long as they are not free;) I take it you got the memo:O

I'm not saying anything about anything that may be indictable if anything
is copyrighted.
--
John
 >> Stay informed about: In case nobody noticed........ 

"JimH" <askme RemoveThis @nope.com> wrote in message
news:47d34456$0$24124$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> .......we have lost some valuable members recently, including Chuck, as
> this NG has become a friggin personal sandbox for a few.
>
> Don't believe me? Just read the threads and posts tonight.
>
> Enjoy......but play nice.
>

I took a couple of days off from here. Tonight I released the 3 main
occupants of my KF to see how they reacted in this thread.....they include
JohnH, Reggie and Booger.

I honestly had hoped that my original post in this thread would cause
change. It showed promise with some members signing on for the change.

3 members did not. I was mocked and attacked in this thread by JohnH,
Reggie and Booger.

I then read other threads and saw the same type of personal attacks and
snarky posts towards another member by those same 3 members...........JohnH,
Reggie and Booger. One was even bold enough to start a new thread trying
to mock that member. Can you say Booger?

I tried to spark a change. JohnH, Reggie and Booger rejected it.

I tried.
 >> Stay informed about: In case nobody noticed........ 

"Tim" <tschnautz.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f91c2b19-8dfd-49e5-bd34-d35794fc864e@u72g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 9, 9:05 am, HK <payer33....RemoveThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
> Wayne.B wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:40:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
> > <chuckgould.ch....RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Pretty soon, it would become apparent that if you
> >> chose not to participate in the fighting and arguing there would be
> >> very little else to do. That's where I'm at. When it got so bad that
> >> it was actually embarrassing to be associated with this group it was
> >> time to go. Getting sucked into the vortex once in a while was
> >> additionally alarming.
>
> > As always, Chuck makes some good points. Too bad that very few are
> > listening.
>
> Does that mean you are going to put a lid on your snarky comments?

Harry, in all fairness are you going to put a lid on all your
political (biased, or un-biased) threads?
========

Tim, in all fairness..........if you are going to be a Sheriff here then
make sure you are being fair with your citations.

I have yet to read a similar comment by you to JohnH, Reggie or
Booger..........the real culprits here.

Fair enough?
 >> Stay informed about: In case nobody noticed........ 

JimH wrote:
> "Tim" <tschnautz.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:f91c2b19-8dfd-49e5-bd34-d35794fc864e@u72g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 9, 9:05 am, HK <payer33....TakeThisOut@mypacks.net> wrote:
>> Wayne.B wrote:
>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:40:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
>>> <chuckgould.ch....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Pretty soon, it would become apparent that if you
>>>> chose not to participate in the fighting and arguing there would be
>>>> very little else to do. That's where I'm at. When it got so bad that
>>>> it was actually embarrassing to be associated with this group it was
>>>> time to go. Getting sucked into the vortex once in a while was
>>>> additionally alarming.
>>> As always, Chuck makes some good points. Too bad that very few are
>>> listening.
>> Does that mean you are going to put a lid on your snarky comments?
>
> Harry, in all fairness are you going to put a lid on all your
> political (biased, or un-biased) threads?
> ========
>
> Tim, in all fairness..........if you are going to be a Sheriff here then
> make sure you are being fair with your citations.
>
> I have yet to read a similar comment by you to JohnH, Reggie or
> Booger..........the real culprits here.
>
> Fair enough?
>
>


Ahhh...someone else noticed. Thanks.
 >> Stay informed about: In case nobody noticed........ 

"HK" <payer33859.DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote in message
news:63lvbgF26ffpiU2@mid.individual.net...
> JimH wrote:
>> "Tim" <tschnautz.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:f91c2b19-8dfd-49e5-bd34-d35794fc864e@u72g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> On Mar 9, 9:05 am, HK <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>> Wayne.B wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:40:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
>>>> <chuckgould.ch....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Pretty soon, it would become apparent that if you
>>>>> chose not to participate in the fighting and arguing there would be
>>>>> very little else to do. That's where I'm at. When it got so bad that
>>>>> it was actually embarrassing to be associated with this group it was
>>>>> time to go. Getting sucked into the vortex once in a while was
>>>>> additionally alarming.
>>>> As always, Chuck makes some good points. Too bad that very few are
>>>> listening.
>>> Does that mean you are going to put a lid on your snarky comments?
>>
>> Harry, in all fairness are you going to put a lid on all your
>> political (biased, or un-biased) threads?
>> ========
>>
>> Tim, in all fairness..........if you are going to be a Sheriff here then
>> make sure you are being fair with your citations.
>>
>> I have yet to read a similar comment by you to JohnH, Reggie or
>> Booger..........the real culprits here.
>>
>> Fair enough?
>
>
> Ahhh...someone else noticed. Thanks.

It was obvious.
 >> Stay informed about: In case nobody noticed........ 

BAR wrote:

DK wrote:

William Bruce wrote:

<LoogyPicker.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote in message


>>> Oh, the guy with the cheap plastic watch?
>>>
>>> That's him! I guess political operatives don't make much money.
>>> Probably have to depend on their wives for travel expenses.
>>>
>>
>> He "has" a $700 office chair!
>
> He probably rolled it out the back door of Ullico as a parting gift.
>



It's hard to imagine four guys on usenet more suited for each other. :>}
 >> Stay informed about: In case nobody noticed........ 

On Mar 10, 6:40 pm, "JimH" <as....DeleteThis@nope.com> wrote:
> "Tim" <tschna....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f91c2b19-8dfd-49e5-bd34-d35794fc864e@u72g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 9, 9:05 am, HK <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
>
> > Wayne.B wrote:
> > > On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:40:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
> > > <chuckgould.ch....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> Pretty soon, it would become apparent that if you
> > >> chose not to participate in the fighting and arguing there would be
> > >> very little else to do. That's where I'm at. When it got so bad that
> > >> it was actually embarrassing to be associated with this group it was
> > >> time to go. Getting sucked into the vortex once in a while was
> > >> additionally alarming.
>
> > > As always, Chuck makes some good points. Too bad that very few are
> > > listening.
>
> > Does that mean you are going to put a lid on your snarky comments?
>
> Harry, in all fairness are you going to put a lid on all your
> political (biased, or un-biased) threads?
> ========
>
> Tim, in all fairness..........if you are going to be a Sheriff here then
> make sure you are being fair with your citations.
>
> I have yet to read a similar comment by you to JohnH, Reggie or
> Booger..........the real culprits here.
>
> Fair enough?

No. and No.
 >> Stay informed about: In case nobody noticed........