On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 13:02:53 -0500, Jim <Jimdotedu.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote:
>If the right wingers can quote newsmax, how can you object to my posting
>slate?
>
>Bert Robbins wrote:
>> "Jim" <Jimdotedu.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:404A107F.9010701@yahoo.com...
>>
>>>From Slate
>>>
>>>http://slate.msn.com/id/2096654/
>>>
>>
>>
>> Ah, that bastion of unbiased reporting. Try reading something a little less
>> tilted to the left.
>>
>> BErt
>>
>>
Is Slate supposed bo be a good source for liberals.
This next paragraph seems pretty unbiased to me:
"Kerry thinks it's the other way around. He's been telling Democrats
Bush is "the biggest say-one-thing, do-another" president ever.
Yesterday Kerry's campaign responded to Bush's ads by accusing the
president of "unsteady leadership." In the Democratic primaries, this
accusation worked for Kerry, because liberals think Bush is a liar.
But most voters don't, for a good reason: It isn't true. If Kerry
makes the election a referendum on Bush's honesty, Bush will win."
Slate makes a good point.
John H
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: The case for Bush is the case against him