 |
|
|
|
Next: SafeAshore.com Grand Opening
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Sep 27, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2003 1:01 pm
Post subject: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question
Archived from groups: rec>boats (more info?)
|
|
|
Hi All: I'm in the market for a Eastern 24' Cuddy Cabin boat. The
boat's dry weight is appx. 3000-3100 lbs. If you live in the New
England area this boat looks exactly like a lobster boat & is.
Although, this will be used for pleasure boating.
Here's my scenario. Eastern is a Honda outboard dealer & they are
pushing the Honda 130. Most the boats I have seen in the water are
using the Honda 130. I have my concerns & I'll give you my thoughts on
the pros & cons. Please note: I can purchase a 2003 (brand new in box)
130 for $9,900.00 but the boat will be a 2004.
Honda 130:
Pros: The Honda name & the 130 has been very, very durable. Decent
amount of service centers. The engine will be installed @ the factory
vs. sending the boat to a Suzuki dealership.
Cons: Price ($10,990.00 rigged 2004 model). Weight=508 lbs.
Suzuki: 140
Pros: Cost ($9,000.00 rigged) 10 more HP. Better gas consumption.
Light=421 lbs. A little quieter in db. Possible 6 year warranty (vs.
standard 3 year) coming January 1st, 2004.
Cons: Dealer network (not a problem were we live. Gloucester, MA.)
Suzuki endurance on the 140???
I took a 24' Eastern center console (not the Cuddy I'm looking at) on
a sea trail w/ the Honda 130 & it pushed the boat fine. Not great, but
I must understand this is not a fast boat to begin with. Do you think
the 87 lbs. & the 10 less HP on the Honda 130 makes that much of a
difference? I'm on the ropes here. Need to make a decision within 2-3
weeks.
I understand that Honda is coming out with a new 2004 135 & 150 HP
engines that weight in @ 478 lbs. Only problem? They cost (appx.)
$12,990.00 for the 150 & $11,990.00 for the 135. This is too much
money! I want to keep the cost on my outboard to around $10,000.00
(max).
My preference would be to have everything done @ Eastern @ turn the
key & go. But I'm leaning towards the Suzuki 140. I would appreciate
any & all insight if you could help me make my decision. Thanks for
your time!
Regards,
Alex Moore |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: 26
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2003 2:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Here is my advise. Shop the internet and get the best price delivered on
the two engines and boat. Take the information to the dealers and talk the
same engines model number, year, hp, warranty. Your dealer should then be
able to offer you a better deal on a boat engine combo. Here is a good link
to start on engine price.
<a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://www.marineengine.com/" target="_blank">http://www.marineengine.com/</a>
You may have to email some to get their price or call the 1-800 toll free
number. Remember to include delivery charge.
Jack
DF140TLK3 140 Remote 20" Electric $8059.00
DF140TXLK3 140 Remote 25" Electric $8108.00
DF140TXGK3 140 Remote 25" Electric $8352.00
"Alex Moore" wrote in message
> Hi All: I'm in the market for a Eastern 24' Cuddy Cabin boat. The
> boat's dry weight is appx. 3000-3100 lbs. If you live in the New
> England area this boat looks exactly like a lobster boat & is.
> Although, this will be used for pleasure boating.
>
> Here's my scenario. Eastern is a Honda outboard dealer & they are
> pushing the Honda 130. Most the boats I have seen in the water are
> using the Honda 130. I have my concerns & I'll give you my thoughts on
> the pros & cons. Please note: I can purchase a 2003 (brand new in box)
> 130 for $9,900.00 but the boat will be a 2004.
>
> Honda 130:
>
> Pros: The Honda name & the 130 has been very, very durable. Decent
> vs. sending the boat to a Suzuki dealership.
>
> Cons: Price ($10,990.00 rigged 2004 model). Weight=508 lbs.
>
> Suzuki: 140
>
> Pros: Cost ($9,000.00 rigged) 10 more HP. Better gas consumption.
> Light=421 lbs. A little quieter in db. Possible 6 year warranty (vs.
> standard 3 year) coming January 1st, 2004.
>
> Cons: Dealer network (not a problem were we live. Gloucester, MA.)
> Suzuki endurance on the 140???
>
> I took a 24' Eastern center console (not the Cuddy I'm looking at) on
> a sea trail w/ the Honda 130 & it pushed the boat fine. Not great, but
> I must understand this is not a fast boat to begin with. Do you think
> the 87 lbs. & the 10 less HP on the Honda 130 makes that much of a
> difference? I'm on the ropes here. Need to make a decision within 2-3
> weeks.
>
> I understand that Honda is coming out with a new 2004 135 & 150 HP
> $12,990.00 for the 150 & $11,990.00 for the 135. This is too much
> money! I want to keep the cost on my outboard to around $10,000.00
> (max).
>
> key & go. But I'm leaning towards the Suzuki 140. I would appreciate
> any & all insight if you could help me make my decision. Thanks for
> your time!
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex Moore |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 08, 2004
Posts: 102
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2003 7:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 14 Oct 2003 12:01:39 -0700, AMooreonline DeleteThis @juno.com (Alex Moore)
wrote:
>Hi All: I'm in the market for a Eastern 24' Cuddy Cabin boat. The
>boat's dry weight is appx. 3000-3100 lbs. If you live in the New
>England area this boat looks exactly like a lobster boat & is.
>Although, this will be used for pleasure boating.
>
>Here's my scenario. Eastern is a Honda outboard dealer & they are
>pushing the Honda 130. Most the boats I have seen in the water are
>using the Honda 130. I have my concerns & I'll give you my thoughts on
>the pros & cons. Please note: I can purchase a 2003 (brand new in box)
>130 for $9,900.00 but the boat will be a 2004.
>
>Honda 130:
>
>Pros: The Honda name & the 130 has been very, very durable. Decent
>vs. sending the boat to a Suzuki dealership.
>
>Cons: Price ($10,990.00 rigged 2004 model). Weight=508 lbs.
>
>Suzuki: 140
>
>Pros: Cost ($9,000.00 rigged) 10 more HP. Better gas consumption.
>Light=421 lbs. A little quieter in db. Possible 6 year warranty (vs.
>standard 3 year) coming January 1st, 2004.
>
>Cons: Dealer network (not a problem were we live. Gloucester, MA.)
>Suzuki endurance on the 140???
>
>I took a 24' Eastern center console (not the Cuddy I'm looking at) on
>a sea trail w/ the Honda 130 & it pushed the boat fine. Not great, but
>I must understand this is not a fast boat to begin with. Do you think
>the 87 lbs. & the 10 less HP on the Honda 130 makes that much of a
>difference? I'm on the ropes here. Need to make a decision within 2-3
>weeks.
>
>I understand that Honda is coming out with a new 2004 135 & 150 HP
>$12,990.00 for the 150 & $11,990.00 for the 135. This is too much
>money! I want to keep the cost on my outboard to around $10,000.00
>(max).
>
>key & go. But I'm leaning towards the Suzuki 140. I would appreciate
>any & all insight if you could help me make my decision. Thanks for
>your time!
>
>Regards,
>
>Alex Moore
I don't know how much this will help, but I have twin DF140's
(stainless prop) on my Gulfstream. They replaced twin 150 hp Yamahas
(Al prop). I didn't lose anything at max throttle and not over 3-4
MPH at any other (%) speed..... at trolling speeds the Suzukis are a
little faster. They are VERY quiet and VERY stingy on gas.
Personally, with no real experience with the Hondas; knowing the
difference in price.... and no issues with the dealer network, I went
with the Suzuki's.
--
Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.
<a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/" target="_blank">http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/</a> Homepage
<a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp" target="_blank">http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp</a> Where Southport,NC is located.
<a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm" target="_blank">http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm</a> Real Time Pictures at My Marina
<a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats" target="_blank">http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats</a> Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 30, 2003
Posts: 155
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2003 8:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Alex Moore wrote:
> Hi All: I'm in the market for a Eastern 24' Cuddy Cabin boat. The
> boat's dry weight is appx. 3000-3100 lbs. If you live in the New
> England area this boat looks exactly like a lobster boat & is.
> Although, this will be used for pleasure boating.
>
> Here's my scenario. Eastern is a Honda outboard dealer & they are
> pushing the Honda 130. Most the boats I have seen in the water are
> using the Honda 130. I have my concerns & I'll give you my thoughts on
> the pros & cons. Please note: I can purchase a 2003 (brand new in box)
> 130 for $9,900.00 but the boat will be a 2004.
>
> Honda 130:
>
> Pros: The Honda name & the 130 has been very, very durable. Decent
> vs. sending the boat to a Suzuki dealership.
>
> Cons: Price ($10,990.00 rigged 2004 model). Weight=508 lbs.
>
> Suzuki: 140
>
> Pros: Cost ($9,000.00 rigged) 10 more HP. Better gas consumption.
> Light=421 lbs. A little quieter in db. Possible 6 year warranty (vs.
> standard 3 year) coming January 1st, 2004.
>
> Cons: Dealer network (not a problem were we live. Gloucester, MA.)
> Suzuki endurance on the 140???
>
> I took a 24' Eastern center console (not the Cuddy I'm looking at) on
> a sea trail w/ the Honda 130 & it pushed the boat fine. Not great, but
> I must understand this is not a fast boat to begin with. Do you think
> the 87 lbs. & the 10 less HP on the Honda 130 makes that much of a
> difference? I'm on the ropes here. Need to make a decision within 2-3
> weeks.
>
> I understand that Honda is coming out with a new 2004 135 & 150 HP
> $12,990.00 for the 150 & $11,990.00 for the 135. This is too much
> money! I want to keep the cost on my outboard to around $10,000.00
> (max).
>
> key & go. But I'm leaning towards the Suzuki 140. I would appreciate
> any & all insight if you could help me make my decision. Thanks for
> your time!
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex Moore
I think the boat is seriously underpowered with either of those engines.
Yamaha has a 150 hp four cycle now, if you insist on a four cycle. It
might do a little better.
--
____________________________________________________________
Email sent to will never reach me. >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 31, 2003
Posts: 189
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2003 10:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 19:16:27 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:
>
>I think the boat is seriously underpowered with either of those engines.
>Yamaha has a 150 hp four cycle now, if you insist on a four cycle. It
>might do a little better.
Hmmmmm.... Harry might have hit on something here..... what is the
data plate HP rating for the hull? Even Rosborough is upping the HP
ante....
--
Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.
<a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/" target="_blank">http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/</a> Homepage
<a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp" target="_blank">http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp</a> Where Southport,NC is located.
<a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm" target="_blank">http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm</a> Real Time Pictures at My Marina
<a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats" target="_blank">http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats</a> Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 27, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2003 11:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Here is my advise. Shop the internet and get the best price delivered
on
the two engines and boat. Take the information to the dealers and
talk the
same engines model number, year, hp, warranty. Your dealer should then
be
able to offer you a better deal on a boat engine combo. Here is a
good link
to start on engine price.
http://www.marineengine.com/
You may have to email some to get their price or call the 1-800 toll
free
number. Remember to include delivery charge.
Jack
DF140TLK3 140 Remote 20" Electric $8059.00
DF140TXLK3 140 Remote 25" Electric $8108.00
DF140TXGK3 140 Remote 25" Electric $8352.00
Jack: 1st, thanks for the reply. Eastern boats are sold direct from
the factory. There kind of a custom boat company. You pick out a hull,
then you say CC or Cuddy Cabin, then you start adding on the options.
Eastern will almost put anything on your boat using after market items
or even fiberglass sections to your liking. Very, very solid boat &
claims praise up here in New England by many boaters.
So, I can't "shop" the boat. They simply don't have dealerships. I can
only look for the best price on the outboard engine. I think the 25"
Shaft (DF140TXLK3) 140 Suzuki is a steal @ $9,000 installed with fuel,
multi-tach gauges from my local dealer. It would cost $100.00 for the
SS Prop & $70.00 extra for the hour meter gauge.
Thanks Again.
Alex >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 06, 2003
Posts: 19
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:46 am
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Alex Moore" wrote in message
> Hi All: I'm in the market for a Eastern 24' Cuddy Cabin boat. The
> boat's dry weight is appx. 3000-3100 lbs. If you live in the New
> England area this boat looks exactly like a lobster boat & is.
> Although, this will be used for pleasure boating.
>
> Here's my scenario. Eastern is a Honda outboard dealer & they are
> pushing the Honda 130.
Are you sure that is enough power for a 24' boat?
I have a 200 Merc on my 22' walkaround that weighs about the same and has an
8' 3" beam and it is good power (46 mph WOT) but I wouldn't want less. >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 27, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:46 am
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"-v-" wrote in message ...
> > Hi All: I'm in the market for a Eastern 24' Cuddy Cabin boat. The
> > boat's dry weight is appx. 3000-3100 lbs. If you live in the New
> > England area this boat looks exactly like a lobster boat & is.
> > Although, this will be used for pleasure boating.
> >
> > Here's my scenario. Eastern is a Honda outboard dealer & they are
> > pushing the Honda 130.
>
> Are you sure that is enough power for a 24' boat?
> I have a 200 Merc on my 22' walkaround that weighs about the same and has an
> 8' 3" beam and it is good power (46 mph WOT) but I wouldn't want less.
V: Almost all of Eastern's 24' "Lobsterfisherman" boats are fitted out
Honda 130's. Is it underpowered? Well...It's not a fast boat to begin
with. It's not a deep or even a modified V hull, it's has a rounded
hull w/ a high bow. It almost has canoe properties in the bow. If you
ever seen a Nova Scotia lobster boat, the Eastern's are in the same
family.
I called Eastern boats & told them I'm leaning towards the Suzuki &
asked is a 140 HP enough. They said "Absolutley" Then I mentioned a
Suzuki 200 HP four stroke & he said too much power. Not needed. I
understand your thinking...I currently have a 20' Robalo CC w/ a
Mariner 135 (V6) 2 stroke & that boat weight is 2650 lbs. The Robalo
is a pocket rocket with that engine.
This boat is really meant to run about 28-30 MPH tops @ 4500-5000 RPM
with a Honda 130. The Honda redlines @ 5500 RPM, the Suzuki 140 is @
6200. I can put a Suzuki 200 four stroke on back but the weight
difference is HUGE. 140 HP=421 lbs. & the 200 HP=581lbs (160 lbs.
difference). I would need trim tabs, which I don't want.
Another poster mentioned the Yamaha 150 four stroke. 1st, this engine
is allocated until March 2004!!! Unreal. 2nd, the cost is a joke
(appx. $14,500) & that doesn't even include installation! The new
Honda 150 HP four stroke, coming out in January is $12,900 installed.
I don't think $3,900 is worth the 10 extra HP vs. the Suzuki 140 @
$9,000.
Here's a link to my 24' Eastern boat:
<a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://www.easternboats.com/tour24.html" target="_blank">http://www.easternboats.com/tour24.html</a>
I'm still on the ropes over here.
Alex >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 06, 2003
Posts: 19
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 3:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Alex Moore" wrote in message
...
> > > Hi All: I'm in the market for a Eastern 24' Cuddy Cabin boat. The
> > > boat's dry weight is appx. 3000-3100 lbs. If you live in the New
> > > England area this boat looks exactly like a lobster boat & is.
> > > Although, this will be used for pleasure boating.
> > >
> > > Here's my scenario. Eastern is a Honda outboard dealer & they are
> > > pushing the Honda 130.
> >
> > Are you sure that is enough power for a 24' boat?
> > I have a 200 Merc on my 22' walkaround that weighs about the same and
has an
> > 8' 3" beam and it is good power (46 mph WOT) but I wouldn't want less.
>
> V: Almost all of Eastern's 24' "Lobsterfisherman" boats are fitted out
> Honda 130's. Is it underpowered? Well...It's not a fast boat to begin
> with. It's not a deep or even a modified V hull, it's has a rounded
> hull w/ a high bow. It almost has canoe properties in the bow. If you
> ever seen a Nova Scotia lobster boat, the Eastern's are in the same
> family.
>
> I called Eastern boats & told them I'm leaning towards the Suzuki &
> asked is a 140 HP enough. They said "Absolutley" Then I mentioned a
> Suzuki 200 HP four stroke & he said too much power. Not needed. I
> understand your thinking...I currently have a 20' Robalo CC w/ a
> Mariner 135 (V6) 2 stroke & that boat weight is 2650 lbs. The Robalo
> is a pocket rocket with that engine.
>
> 6200. I can put a Suzuki 200 four stroke on back but the weight
> difference is HUGE. 140 HP=421 lbs. & the 200 HP=581lbs (160 lbs.
> difference). I would need trim tabs, which I don't want.
>
> Another poster mentioned the Yamaha 150 four stroke. 1st, this engine
> is allocated until March 2004!!! Unreal. 2nd, the cost is a joke
> (appx. $14,500) & that doesn't even include installation! The new
> Honda 150 HP four stroke, coming out in January is $12,900 installed.
> $9,000.
>
> Here's a link to my 24' Eastern boat:
>
<font color=purple> > <a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://www.easternboats.com/tour24.html</font" target="_blank">http://www.easternboats.com/tour24.html</font</a>>
>
> I'm still on the ropes over here.
>
> Alex
>
I like the lighter weight and extra power of the Suzuki but I don't have
personal experience with either one.
How is the dealer service for Suzuki vs Honda in your area? >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 27, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 3:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I like the lighter weight and extra power of the Suzuki but I don't
have
> personal experience with either one.
>
> How is the dealer service for Suzuki vs Honda in your area?
Excellent! There's a large Suzuki dealership about 3 miles away & has
all the services you could ask for i.e. bottom painting, shrinkwrap,
winter storage etc. I prefer the Suzuki dealer in terms of location
vs. the Honda dealership in town. We have both. I live in Gloucester,
MA. (Home of The Perfect Storm) & it's a real seacoast community.
Regards,
Alex >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 11, 2004
Posts: 172
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 4:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Hi ALex,
Quite a few of the local commercial fisherman and many of the guides
have gone over to the Suzuki engines. They are really quiet, and sip
fuel with an eyedropper. The counter-rotation of the crankshaft and
propshaft cancel out vibration.
The 115 is the most common engine in use by the "crabbers" and the 140
is favored by the bass guides.
I have spoken with Jerry at Advanced Marine. (Craven Rd, Jacksonville
FL) Advance Marine is a factory authorized Suzuki and Tohatsu repair and
sales shop. Jerry had shown me the Suzuki's on board computer which
records the engine's use over its life span. The motor (90hp) we were
looking at was 2 1/2 years old. It looked well used too. Downright scruffy!
I was astonished to see the computer had recorded over 18,000 hours of use.
Capt. Frank
Alex Moore wrote:
>
>>
>>>Hi All: I'm in the market for a Eastern 24' Cuddy Cabin boat. The
>>>boat's dry weight is appx. 3000-3100 lbs. If you live in the New
>>>England area this boat looks exactly like a lobster boat & is.
>>>Although, this will be used for pleasure boating.
>>>
>>>Here's my scenario. Eastern is a Honda outboard dealer & they are
>>>pushing the Honda 130.
>>
>>Are you sure that is enough power for a 24' boat?
>>I have a 200 Merc on my 22' walkaround that weighs about the same and has an
>>8' 3" beam and it is good power (46 mph WOT) but I wouldn't want less.
>
>
> V: Almost all of Eastern's 24' "Lobsterfisherman" boats are fitted out
> Honda 130's. Is it underpowered? Well...It's not a fast boat to begin
> with. It's not a deep or even a modified V hull, it's has a rounded
> hull w/ a high bow. It almost has canoe properties in the bow. If you
> ever seen a Nova Scotia lobster boat, the Eastern's are in the same
> family.
>
> I called Eastern boats & told them I'm leaning towards the Suzuki &
> asked is a 140 HP enough. They said "Absolutley" Then I mentioned a
> Suzuki 200 HP four stroke & he said too much power. Not needed. I
> understand your thinking...I currently have a 20' Robalo CC w/ a
> Mariner 135 (V6) 2 stroke & that boat weight is 2650 lbs. The Robalo
> is a pocket rocket with that engine.
>
> 6200. I can put a Suzuki 200 four stroke on back but the weight
> difference is HUGE. 140 HP=421 lbs. & the 200 HP=581lbs (160 lbs.
> difference). I would need trim tabs, which I don't want.
>
> Another poster mentioned the Yamaha 150 four stroke. 1st, this engine
> is allocated until March 2004!!! Unreal. 2nd, the cost is a joke
> (appx. $14,500) & that doesn't even include installation! The new
> Honda 150 HP four stroke, coming out in January is $12,900 installed.
> $9,000.
>
> Here's a link to my 24' Eastern boat:
>
<font color=purple> > <a rel="nofollow" style='text-decoration: none;' href="http://www.easternboats.com/tour24.html</font" target="_blank">http://www.easternboats.com/tour24.html</font</a>>
>
> I'm still on the ropes over here.
>
> Alex >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 26, 2004
Posts: 15
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 4:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in message
> Hi ALex,
snip
> I have spoken with Jerry at Advanced Marine. (Craven Rd, Jacksonville
> FL) Advance Marine is a factory authorized Suzuki and Tohatsu repair and
> sales shop. Jerry had shown me the Suzuki's on board computer which
> records the engine's use over its life span. The motor (90hp) we were
> looking at was 2 1/2 years old. It looked well used too. Downright
scruffy!
>
> I was astonished to see the computer had recorded over 18,000 hours of
use.
>
> Capt. Frank
>
> Alex Moore wrote:
>
snip
Be suspicious. 2.5 years is only 21,900 hours (24*365*2.5). So apparently
they never turned the motor off, except for christmas and hurricanes.
seems a little hard to believe.
del cecchi >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 29, 2003
Posts: 455
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 6:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:35:34 GMT, "Capt. Frank Hopkins"
wrote:
>The motor (90hp) we were
>looking at was 2 1/2 years old. It looked well used too. Downright scruffy!
>
>I was astonished to see the computer had recorded over 18,000 hours of use.
>
>Capt. Frank
You should be. That would be running over two years, 24 hours a day.
So much for their computer recording. >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 06, 2003
Posts: 19
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 10:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Alex Moore" wrote in message
> I like the lighter weight and extra power of the Suzuki but I don't
> have
> > personal experience with either one.
> >
> > How is the dealer service for Suzuki vs Honda in your area?
>
>
> Excellent! There's a large Suzuki dealership about 3 miles away & has
> all the services you could ask for i.e. bottom painting, shrinkwrap,
> winter storage etc. I prefer the Suzuki dealer in terms of location
> vs. the Honda dealership in town. We have both. I live in Gloucester,
> MA. (Home of The Perfect Storm) & it's a real seacoast community.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
That might be your answer! >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jan 11, 2004
Posts: 172
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2003 4:19 am
Post subject: Re: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Well Wally,
They are commercial guys and really do work for a living. My point was
Suzuki makes a good motor. FYI 2 1/2 years equals is 21,900 hours. I
guess they do sleep a little.
Capt. Frank
WaIIy wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:35:34 GMT, "Capt. Frank Hopkins"
>
>
>>The motor (90hp) we were
>>looking at was 2 1/2 years old. It looked well used too. Downright scruffy!
>>
>>I was astonished to see the computer had recorded over 18,000 hours of use.
>>
>>Capt. Frank
>
>
> You should be. That would be running over two years, 24 hours a day.
>
> So much for their computer recording. >> Stay informed about: Suzuki 140 vs. Honda 130 Four Stroke Question |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
| Related Topics: | Suzuki/Johnson DF140 vs Honda BF135 4 Strokes - I am planning to repower my 6m Aluminium Cuddy with a new 4 stroke motor. I have come up with three candidates. The Suzuki DF140 (and the Johnson which is essentially a rebadged DF140) or the new Honda BF135. Suzuki DF140 DOHC inline 4 cyl 16 valve..
HELP PLEASE Suzuki DF70 four stroke efi problem - Hi all I have a Suzuki DF70 in or repair, the warning horn is blipping when the engine is running. There are no fault codes when i run diagnostic softwere. When i introduce a fault the check engine light operates on tacho and buzzer bleeps. I have..
Honda 50 4 stroke vs Yamaha 60 4 stroke - Hi, I have been through all the old news articles FAQ's etc but am still a tad confused. I am buying a new 4.75metre (16ft) Aluminiun Quintrex Runabout(Australian brand) and different dealers have different packages. One dealer offers a 50hp Honda 4..
FS: 2002 Lund Fisherman 1800 with 2003 Honda 115hp 4-stroke - I'm selling my 2002 Lund Fisherman 1800, outfitted with a 2003 Honda 115hp 4-stroke. It's got tons of options and features. If it's a boat you think you might be interested in, I've posted a full description and pictures on my family website. You can....
Winterizing a Honda outboard 4 stroke (90HP) - Is there a web site, or a step by step manual to winterizing this engine? I bought a Honda 90 -- 4 stroke, second hand, and there is no manual. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
