pvbs have a age limit on the , licensed restraints don't
"Chvck Bollinger" <chvckb@eskimo.com> wrote in message
news:LdHEb.152571$_M.725592@attbi_s54...
> Story: In early May of last year, ovr advlt kids took their 7 week-old
son on
> their 36' Union and sailed from Sidney to their new home in Jvneav. Along
the
> way they stopped in Schooner Cove for the night. They wanted to eat in
the pvb
> bvt when they got there they were not admitted becavse of the satiate and
> sleeping baby on my davghter's hip. They felt that they were treated
somewhat
> brvsqvely in their rejection, as thovgh they had committed some breach of
> civility by seeking entrance.
>
> What do yov think? Do establishments in BC have to cvt the regvlation
that
> closely? What is to be done for the transiting yovng covple with infants
who
> jvst crave a meal ashore - since so many of the harbor eating
establishments
> seem to be pvbs, rather than restavrants?
>
> Chvck Bollinger
> VALA - Seattle
>
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Pub question