Welcome to BoatingForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Most Layoff Events for a January

 
Goto page 1, 2
   Boating Forums (Home) -> Boat General Discussion RSS
Related Topics:
??? about fiberglass roofing a houseboat - I have a houseboat whose roof has a bunch of thin spider cracks, as well as some a bit bigger. The biggest ones aren't wide enough to get any more than a razor knife blade in, if that. I want to put some more sheet on it, and have never done..

??? about hooking together batteries for inverter - How should more than one battery be hooked together as a supply for an inverter? Does it matter which battery in the group the battery charger is attached to? It will be an automatic charger. Will all of the batteries drain down and build back up pretty..

Rhino type bed liners on boats??? - Is it a good idea to coat the bottom of a steel hull houseboat with a bed liner like Rhino Tuff Stuff, or something like it? One person told me they start to peel off after a few years, but I would think there are products of different quality, as well as

Preventing Rot ?? - That boat, as some may be tired of reading, is a 1958 Chris Craft. It's a plywood lapstrake hull. Mostly we trailer it. When running there is a small leak and the bilge gets an inch or so of water. Each time we pull her out all the water dries up. But..

Floating houses? - A guy down the dock recently got back from a trip out west He was talking about some up around they do a lot of logging, and move logs with barges, etc. He said there were houses built on logs out there,..
Next:  Boat General Discussion: A quote from my favorite English professor...  
Author Message
Harry Krause1

External


Since: Jan 19, 2004
Posts: 1797



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 10:43 am
Post subject: Most Layoff Events for a January
Archived from groups: rec>boats (more info?)

From the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

MASS LAYOFFS IN JANUARY 2004


In January 2004, there were 2,428 mass layoff actions by employers, as
measured by new filings for unemployment insurance benefits during the
month, according to data from the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of
Labor Statistics. Each action involved at least 50 persons from a
single establishment, and the number of workers involved totaled 239,454.


This marked the most events for a January and the third highest
January level of mass-layoff initial claims since the series began.
Both the number of layoff events and initial claims were higher than a
year ago. January 2004 marked only the third time in the last two years
that initial claims had increased over the year.


-----------------------

Bush fiddles while employment burns

 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
Tuuk1

External


Since: Mar 15, 2004
Posts: 157



(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 1:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Well Harry, here is more proof that yovr vnions have made more disasters for
the west. Yov show yovr ignorance by even mentioning Bvsh after this
article. It is clearly obviovs that this is a resvlt of vnions and labor
here in the west. Bvsh has never belonged to a vnion, he is a conservative,
who are typically not associated with vnions (of covrse there are some
conservatives on vnions).
Teachers and vnions, fvll blame for this.






"Harry Kravse" <piedtypecase.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c1kpl8$1i5hvp$3@ID-21096.news.vni-berlin.de...
 > From the Bvreav of Labor Statistics:
 >
 > MASS LAYOFFS IN JANUARY 2004
 >
 >
 > In Janvary 2004, there were 2,428 mass layoff actions by employers, as
 > measvred by new filings for vnemployment insvrance benefits dvring the
 > month, according to data from the U.S. Department of Labor's Bvreav of
 > Labor Statistics. Each action involved at least 50 persons from a
 > single establishment, and the nvmber of workers involved totaled 239,454.
 >
 >
 > This marked the most events for a Janvary and the third highest
 > Janvary level of mass-layoff initial claims since the series began.
 > Both the nvmber of layoff events and initial claims were higher than a
 > year ago. Janvary 2004 marked only the third time in the last two years
 > that initial claims had increased over the year.
 >
 >
 > -----------------------
 >
 > Bvsh fiddles while employment bvrns<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
NOYB

External


Since: Jul 12, 2004
Posts: 1224



(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 4:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

The Facts Show Increase of Jobs Under Bush

Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004

The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3 million jobs
lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job record
since before World War II, they claim.
One little problem: It's not true.

Not only has there been no net loss of jobs during the Bush administration,
there has been a net gain, even with the devastation of 9/11. At least 2.4
million jobs have been created since the president took office, 2 million of
those in 2003. The gains more than offset the losses.

While Democrats continue to beat their election-year drums about
outsourcing, manufacturing losses, unemployment and slow growth in
employment, America's economy has been steadily creating jobs.

At least 366,000 jobs have been created in the last five months, over
100,000 of those in January, White House press secretary Scott McClellan has
noted. And though the eight-month recession "officially" ended in November,
economic indicators are surprising economists and pointing toward a take-off
in the recovery.

The signs:


a.. The 5.6 percent unemployment rate is the lowest in two years and below
the average of the 1980s (7.3 percent) and '90s (5.8 percent), and still
continues to drop.

a.. The nation's economic output revealed the strongest quarterly growth in
20 years. The data for the fourth quarter of 2003 show that the civilian
labor force rose by 333,000, while the number of unemployed in the labor
force dropped by 575,000. Even better, the number of so-called discouraged
workers declined in December.

a.. Consumer spending grew between 4 percent and 5 percent last year, and
real hourly earnings rose 1.5 percent. Real earnings have risen over the
last three years.

a.. Exports doubled to 19 percent in the fourth quarter, compared to less
than 9 percent in the third.

a.. The number of American workers is at an all-time high of 138.5 million,
a level never before attained in U.S. history.

a.. Jobless claims are 10 percent below the average of the last 25 years and
still falling.

a.. Hiring indices are up, even in manufacturing.

a.. Productivity growth is extremely high.

Now the doomsayers are criticizing the validity of the unemployment rate,
which at 5.6 percent does not fit their gloomy story.


Faulty Counting


The problem is the areas of biggest job growth are usually not even being
counted at all.


Though 75 percent of jobs are created by small companies, according to the
Small Business Administration, this sector's entrepreneurial activity and
the jobs it creates are left out by Washington bean counters when
calculating official new job numbers.


The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) does its Payroll Survey by phoning
businesses to crunch the number of jobs that have been gained or lost. This
is where Democrats grabbed onto their lifeline, the 2.3 million figure. Look
only at the Payroll Survey, and there has been a gain of only 522,000 jobs
since Bush took office.

But here's the rub. The Household Survey is used to determine the
unemployment rate and accounts for those who are self-employed, and small
emerging businesses that might be overlooked by the Payroll Survey. But the
number of U.S. firms isn't static, and the "fixed list" used by the BLS for
phoning established businesses does not reflect new entrepreneurial
activity.

People are called at home and asked if they have jobs, or if they are in the
market for a job. In contrast to the Payroll Survey, the Household Survey
shows that 2.4 million jobs have been created so far during Bush's time in
office.

As Economy.com writer Haseeb Ahmed recently wrote, "something is amiss in
the [Payroll] survey."

Credit Where Credit Is Due

That's not all. When doomsayers, and media spoiling for a fight in an
election year, laughed at Bush's prediction of 2.6 million new jobs this
year, not everyone was scoffing.

Ahmed, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and others hardly batted an
eye. Greenspan said it was "probably feasible" the economy would reach the
Bush administration's forecast of adding 2.6 million jobs this year,
provided growth continues and the productivity rate slows to more typically
levels.

"I don't think it's 'Fantasyland,'" Greenspan said.

"I agree with him," said John Ryding, chief market economist at Bear
Stearns. "I think that we will create 2.5 million, possibly more, jobs over
the balance of the year."

Ahmed is convinced that "the revision patterns of the early-1990s recovery
cycle" will be repeated. A total of 1.4 million job gains were revised
upward to 2.9 million in the first 21 months after the end of the last
recession, just after Bush Sr. was voted out of office.


begin 666 spacer.gif
M1TE&.#EA`0`!`)'_`/___P```````,# P"'Y! $```,`+ `````!``$`0 ("
$7 $`.P``
`
end
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
Harry Krause2

External


Since: May 03, 2004
Posts: 99



(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 4:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

NOYB wrote:

 > The Facts Show Increase of Jobs Under Bush
 >
 > Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004
 >
 > The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3 million jobs
 > lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job record
 > since before World War II, they claim.
 > One little problem: It's not true.

Puh-lease...these apologeticas you dig up to rationalize the utter
failure of DubyaDumfoch do nothing but make you look as stupid as he is,
and you can't be, not if you graduated from dental school.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
John H1

External


Since: Dec 31, 2003
Posts: 349



(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 10:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:43:18 -0500, Harry Krause
<piedtypecase.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote:

 >From the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
 >
 >MASS LAYOFFS IN JANUARY 2004
 >
 >
 >In January 2004, there were 2,428 mass layoff actions by employers, as
 >measured by new filings for unemployment insurance benefits during the
 >month, according to data from the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of
 >Labor Statistics. Each action involved at least 50 persons from a
 >single establishment, and the number of workers involved totaled 239,454.
 >
 >
 >This marked the most events for a January and the third highest
 >January level of mass-layoff initial claims since the series began.
 >Both the number of layoff events and initial claims were higher than a
 >year ago. January 2004 marked only the third time in the last two years
 >that initial claims had increased over the year.
 >
 >American people with the bill."

Of course, Kerry has the problem solved, according to today's
Washington Post:

snipped

"Kerry's speech, however, underscored the challenge for Democrats on
the issue. The only new proposal he offered would do nothing to stop
companies from moving jobs overseas, but would give government and
workers more advance notification.

Kerry said he would require companies to give three months' notice
before moving jobs abroad; the notice would go to workers and
government agencies tasked with offering laid-off employees assistance
and training. He said he would also require the Labor Department to
gather statistics on the number of jobs that have gone abroad, by
company, and to report them to Congress on an annual basis.

The Kerry campaign estimated that about 1 million jobs have moved
overseas since President Bush took office. Gene Sperling, a top
economic adviser in the Clinton White House, who briefed reporters,
acknowledged that the steps Kerry proposed Wednesday would not, by
themselves, do much to change the behavior of such companies. "

snipped

Wow, three months notice and gathering statistics. That ought to solve
all our job problems. What a joke!


John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
John H1

External


Since: Dec 31, 2003
Posts: 349



(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 10:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thv, 26 Feb 2004 10:49:15 -0500, " Tvvk" <bangkokbob5001.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com>
wrote:

 >Well Harry, here is more proof that yovr vnions have made more disasters for
 >the west. Yov show yovr ignorance by even mentioning Bvsh after this
 >article. It is clearly obviovs that this is a resvlt of vnions and labor
 >here in the west. Bvsh has never belonged to a vnion, he is a conservative,
 >who are typically not associated with vnions (of covrse there are some
 >conservatives on vnions).
 >Teachers and vnions, fvll blame for this.
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >"Harry Kravse" <piedtypecase.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
 >news:c1kpl8$1i5hvp$3@ID-21096.news.vni-berlin.de...
  >> From the Bvreav of Labor Statistics:
  >>
  >> MASS LAYOFFS IN JANUARY 2004
  >>
  >>
  >> In Janvary 2004, there were 2,428 mass layoff actions by employers, as
  >> measvred by new filings for vnemployment insvrance benefits dvring the
  >> month, according to data from the U.S. Department of Labor's Bvreav of
  >> Labor Statistics. Each action involved at least 50 persons from a
  >> single establishment, and the nvmber of workers involved totaled 239,454.
  >>
  >>
  >> This marked the most events for a Janvary and the third highest
  >> Janvary level of mass-layoff initial claims since the series began.
  >> Both the nvmber of layoff events and initial claims were higher than a
  >> year ago. Janvary 2004 marked only the third time in the last two years
  >> that initial claims had increased over the year.
  >>
  >>
  >> -----------------------
  >>
  >> Bvsh fiddles while employment bvrns
 >


How the hell, again, are teachers responsible for this?

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' ovt of Deale, MD
on the beavtifvl Chesapeake Bay!<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
Harry Krause1

External


Since: Jan 19, 2004
Posts: 1797



(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 10:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

John H wrote:

 > On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:43:18 -0500, Harry Krause
 > <piedtypecase.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
 >
  >>From the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
  >>
  >>MASS LAYOFFS IN JANUARY 2004
  >>
  >>
  >>In January 2004, there were 2,428 mass layoff actions by employers, as
  >>measured by new filings for unemployment insurance benefits during the
  >>month, according to data from the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of
  >>Labor Statistics. Each action involved at least 50 persons from a
  >>single establishment, and the number of workers involved totaled 239,454.
  >>
  >>
  >>This marked the most events for a January and the third highest
  >>January level of mass-layoff initial claims since the series began.
  >>Both the number of layoff events and initial claims were higher than a
  >>year ago. January 2004 marked only the third time in the last two years
  >>that initial claims had increased over the year.
  >>
  >>American people with the bill."
 >
 > Of course, Kerry has the problem solved, according to today's
 > Washington Post:
 >
 > snipped
 >
 > "Kerry's speech, however, underscored the challenge for Democrats on
 > the issue. The only new proposal he offered would do nothing to stop
 > companies from moving jobs overseas, but would give government and
 > workers more advance notification.
 >
 > Kerry said he would require companies to give three months' notice
 > before moving jobs abroad; the notice would go to workers and
 > government agencies tasked with offering laid-off employees assistance
 > and training. He said he would also require the Labor Department to
 > gather statistics on the number of jobs that have gone abroad, by
 > company, and to report them to Congress on an annual basis.
 >
 > The Kerry campaign estimated that about 1 million jobs have moved
 > overseas since President Bush took office. Gene Sperling, a top
 > economic adviser in the Clinton White House, who briefed reporters,
 > acknowledged that the steps Kerry proposed Wednesday would not, by
 > themselves, do much to change the behavior of such companies. "
 >
 > snipped
 >
 > Wow, three months notice and gathering statistics. That ought to solve
 > all our job problems. What a joke!
 >
 >
 > John H
 >
 > On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
 > on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


Kerry has announced a number of plans to help stop the flood of jobs
heading overseas. Your reference is to today's speech (or perhaps
yesterday's), in which he only announced one idea he didn't previously
discuss.

If this is an example of a military man's ability to research and
abstract, it's no wonder we lost in Korea and Vietnam, and are reduced
to fighting the crappy little armies of third-rate dictators these days.
It takes smart people to win a real war, which may explain why our win
record since WW II has been mediocre.

Or are you just trying to be disingenuous?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
John H1

External


Since: Dec 31, 2003
Posts: 349



(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 11:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:23:46 -0500, Harry Krause
<piedtypecase RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:

 >John H wrote:
 >
  >> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:43:18 -0500, Harry Krause
  >> <piedtypecase RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
  >>
   >>>From the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
   >>>
   >>>MASS LAYOFFS IN JANUARY 2004
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>In January 2004, there were 2,428 mass layoff actions by employers, as
   >>>measured by new filings for unemployment insurance benefits during the
   >>>month, according to data from the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of
   >>>Labor Statistics. Each action involved at least 50 persons from a
   >>>single establishment, and the number of workers involved totaled 239,454.
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>This marked the most events for a January and the third highest
   >>>January level of mass-layoff initial claims since the series began.
   >>>Both the number of layoff events and initial claims were higher than a
   >>>year ago. January 2004 marked only the third time in the last two years
   >>>that initial claims had increased over the year.
   >>>
   >>>American people with the bill."
  >>
  >> Of course, Kerry has the problem solved, according to today's
  >> Washington Post:
  >>
  >> snipped
  >>
  >> "Kerry's speech, however, underscored the challenge for Democrats on
  >> the issue. The only new proposal he offered would do nothing to stop
  >> companies from moving jobs overseas, but would give government and
  >> workers more advance notification.
  >>
  >> Kerry said he would require companies to give three months' notice
  >> before moving jobs abroad; the notice would go to workers and
  >> government agencies tasked with offering laid-off employees assistance
  >> and training. He said he would also require the Labor Department to
  >> gather statistics on the number of jobs that have gone abroad, by
  >> company, and to report them to Congress on an annual basis.
  >>
  >> The Kerry campaign estimated that about 1 million jobs have moved
  >> overseas since President Bush took office. Gene Sperling, a top
  >> economic adviser in the Clinton White House, who briefed reporters,
  >> acknowledged that the steps Kerry proposed Wednesday would not, by
  >> themselves, do much to change the behavior of such companies. "
  >>
  >> snipped
  >>
  >> Wow, three months notice and gathering statistics. That ought to solve
  >> all our job problems. What a joke!
  >>
  >>
  >> John H
  >>
  >> On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
  >> on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!
 >
 >
 >Kerry has announced a number of plans to help stop the flood of jobs
 >heading overseas. Your reference is to today's speech (or perhaps
 >yesterday's), in which he only announced one idea he didn't previously
 >discuss.
 >
 >If this is an example of a military man's ability to research and
 >abstract, it's no wonder we lost in Korea and Vietnam, and are reduced
 >to fighting the crappy little armies of third-rate dictators these days.
 >It takes smart people to win a real war, which may explain why our win
 >record since WW II has been mediocre.
 >
 >Or are you just trying to be disingenuous?


Oh, I just pasted what appeared to be the best of his proposals.
Others were mentioned in the article. Here's another selection:

"Sperling noted that there is not a "silver bullet" when it comes to
outsourcing. But he said Kerry has made other proposals, including a
manufacturing tax credit, a health care plan that he said would cut
corporate costs and an energy plan that would lower production costs
for U.S. companies and make it more attractive for them to keep their
plants in this country."

A manufacturing tax credit sure sounds like a tax cut for the wealthy
corporations. If health care costs were reduced by 95%, corporations
would still save money by outsourcing. Notice how specific Kerry is
about the 'energy savings' he will provide. Yeah, right!

I suppose there *are* people who believe this. I sure hope you aren't
one of them, Harry.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
NOYB

External


Since: Jul 12, 2004
Posts: 1224



(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2004 4:12 am
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Harry Krause" <etaoin_shrdlu-no-spam.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c3dhc2g=.6411803546648fe5e76cec188a5e909f@1077816413.nulluser.com...
 > NOYB wrote:
 >
  > > The Facts Show Increase of Jobs Under Bush
  > >
  > > Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004
  > >
  > > The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3 million
jobs
  > > lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job
record
  > > since before World War II, they claim.
  > > One little problem: It's not true.
 >
 > Puh-lease...these apologeticas

Well, then you explain the large disparity between the Payroll Survey data
and the Household Survey data. Can't? I didn't think so. The Payroll
Survey (that'd be the piece of crappola you Dems keep bringing up) is
flawed...and fails to account for those employed by new businesses...or
those who are self-employed.

Look at the Unemployment Rate. It's at 5.6%...which is 0.2% below its
*average* for the 90's.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
Harry Krause1

External


Since: Jan 19, 2004
Posts: 1797



(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2004 4:12 am
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

NOYB wrote:
 > "Harry Krause" <etaoin_shrdlu-no-spam.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
 > news:c3dhc2g=.6411803546648fe5e76cec188a5e909f@1077816413.nulluser.com...
  >> NOYB wrote:
  >>
   >> > The Facts Show Increase of Jobs Under Bush
   >> >
   >> > Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004
   >> >
   >> > The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3 million
 > jobs
   >> > lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job
 > record
   >> > since before World War II, they claim.
   >> > One little problem: It's not true.
  >>
  >> Puh-lease...these apologeticas
 >
 > Well, then you explain the large disparity between the Payroll Survey data
 > and the Household Survey data. Can't? I didn't think so. The Payroll
 > Survey (that'd be the piece of crappola you Dems keep bringing up) is
 > flawed...and fails to account for those employed by new businesses...or
 > those who are self-employed.

Ah, yes...the newly self-employed...laid-off workers who can't find work.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
NOYB

External


Since: Jul 12, 2004
Posts: 1224



(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2004 4:13 am
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Harry Krause" <piedtypecase DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c1m2mm$1i79b5$1@ID-

 > Kerry has announced a number of plans

Oh yeah? Then name *one*.

Come on , Harry, name just *one* little plan Kerry has laid forth to stem
the flow of manufacturing jobs.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
thunder

External


Since: Dec 31, 2003
Posts: 207



(Msg. 12) Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:48 am
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:13:37 +0000, NOYB wrote:

 >
 > "Harry Krause" <piedtypecase RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
 > news:c1m2mm$1i79b5$1@ID-
 >
  >> Kerry has announced a number of plans
 >
 > Oh yeah? Then name *one*.
 >
 > Come on , Harry, name just *one* little plan Kerry has laid forth to stem
 > the flow of manufacturing jobs.

Geez guy, this is the internet, read for yourself:

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">http://www.johnkerry.com/</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
NOYB

External


Since: Jul 12, 2004
Posts: 1224



(Msg. 13) Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2004 3:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"thunder" <thunderTAKEOUT.TakeThisOut@gti.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.02.27.11.48.52.814099@gti.net...
 > On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:13:37 +0000, NOYB wrote:
 >
  > >
  > > "Harry Krause" <piedtypecase.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
  > > news:c1m2mm$1i79b5$1@ID-
  > >
   > >> Kerry has announced a number of plans
  > >
  > > Oh yeah? Then name *one*.
  > >
  > > Come on , Harry, name just *one* little plan Kerry has laid forth to
stem
  > > the flow of manufacturing jobs.
 >
 > Geez guy, this is the internet, read for yourself:
 >
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.johnkerry.com/</font" target="_blank">http://www.johnkerry.com/</font</a>>

Thanks for the link. I saw where Kerry blamed Bush for the loss of
manufacturing jobs...but there is no detailed plan on how Kerry would deal
with the issue. Go ahead and look for yourself. See if you can post one
Kerry plan for stopping the loss of manufacturing jobs overseas.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
Harry Krause2

External


Since: May 03, 2004
Posts: 99



(Msg. 14) Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2004 5:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Tvvk wrote:

 > Well Harry, here is more proof that yovr vnions have made more
disasters for
 > the west. Yov show yovr ignorance by even mentioning Bvsh after this
 > article. It is clearly obviovs that this is a resvlt of vnions and labor
 > here in the west. Bvsh has never belonged to a vnion, he is a
conservative,
 > who are typically not associated with vnions (of covrse there are some
 > conservatives on vnions).
 > Teachers and vnions, fvll blame for this.


Yovr posts read as if yov were tossed ovt of school permanently in the
third grade. Either that, or yov've been bvngee-jvmping with too long a
cord.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
Don White

External


Since: Aug 28, 2003
Posts: 781



(Msg. 15) Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2004 11:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Most Layoff Events for a January [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Harry Krause <etaoin_shrdlu-no-spam.DeleteThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message > Your
posts read as if you were tossed out of school permanently in the
 > third grade. Either that, or you've been bungee-jumping with too long a
 > cord.
 >
he he he....that's probably why he keeps 'shaking the head'. That ground is
hard when you keep trying to bury your noggin in it.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Most Layoff Events for a January 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Boating Forums (Home) -> Boat General Discussion All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page 1, 2
Page 1 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]