 |
|
 |
|
Next: Still no justice for South Carolina native
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jun 22, 2003 Posts: 235
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Koden radars? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: rec>boats>electronics (more info?)
|
|
|
I don't know Bruce, but I guess the average power of this is something just
less than 5 KW on long range and the distance between the radiator and
helmsman is around 10 ft and when rotating at 24 rpm the helmsman is in the
zone 14% of the time, so the average power exposure is still 700 watts at
the Slot Line and 300 Watts at 10 ft. Still, that can't be healthy over
time. Perhaps I did not do the math correctly, but that's what I came up
with.
Steve
"Bruce in alaska" <fast DeleteThis @btpost.net> wrote in message
news:fast-948D57.09502405012008@netnews.worldnet.att.net...
> In article <flo595$4kn$01$1@news.t-online.com>,
> "Steve Lusardi" <stevenospam DeleteThis @lusardi.de> wrote:
>
>> Bruce,
>> The 20 degree fan does prevent the helmsman on my boat from being in the
>> path of heavy radiation and the sidelobe power outside that 20 degree fan
>> is -28 DB and that is important to me. The specs for Furuno radiator
>> XN20AF/6.5 Beamwidth (H) 1.23 degrees, Beamwidth (V) 20 degrees. On the
>> other hand their S band antennas are 25 degrees like the SN30AF. In point
>> of
>> fact all the Furuno X band radars are 20 degrees, not just the 6 footer,
>> which is in line with your statement that all Slot-Line anennas have the
>> same vertical fan, but the number is 20 for X Band not 25, but I do
>> recall
>> that antennas by other manufacturers are 30 degrees.
>>
>> By the way, I did listen to your advice last year and scrapped the 6 KW
>> Decca and acquired an FR2125BB.
>> Steve
>>
>> "Bruce in alaska" <fast DeleteThis @btpost.net> wrote in message
>> news:fast-02DC90.12492804012008@netnews.worldnet.att.net...
>> > In article <flji7g$rsi$00$1@news.t-online.com>,
>> > "Steve Lusardi" <stevenospam DeleteThis @lusardi.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >> >
>> > Ok Steve, Please tell us all about why this would be important.
>> > Actually, the Vertical Beam-width of a ANY Slot-line Radar Antenna, is
>> > NOT related to the length of the Antenna, at all, but IS related to the
>> > design of the Slot-line shielding, and slot-line position inside the
>> > shielding. If you look at the Furuno Antenna Spec's you will notice
>> > that ALL the Slot-Line Antennas, have a 25° Vertical Beam-width, and
>> > have had since Furuno first Started importing their products to the
>> > USA, back in the KRA-121 days.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Bruce in alaska
>> > add <path> after <fast> to reply
>
> So your inference is that "IF" a RADAR Antennas Main radiation Lobe
> intersects with where a human stands, that this is somehow "Bad",
> or dangerous? Hmmm, have you ever done the math, to calculate the
> Power Density of the RF Energy at the face of the antenna, at a
> distance of twice the Slot-Line Antenna Length, or even at 20 Ft
> from the Antenna? Then consider that it is Rotating, and the human
> is only in the Radiation Field less than 5% of the time. Add to that,
> the fact that for non-ionizing Radiation, it is Average Power, and not
> Peak Power, that creates harm to biologics. What is the Average RF Power
> Output from this Xband Marine Radar? As in all RF Radiation, Marine
> Xband Radar Energy follows the Inverse Square Law.
>
> Your concerns, however irrational, are yours, to deal with, but the Math
> doesn't compute in your favor, here.
>
> Bruce in alaska
>
> --
> Bruce in alaska
> add <path> after <fast> to reply >> Stay informed about: Koden radars? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 04, 2008 Posts: 28
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Koden radars? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <flopc2$DKr$01$1@news.t-online.com>,
"Steve Lizard" <stevenospam.DeleteThis@lusardi.de> wrote:
> I don't know Bruce, but I guess the average power of this is something just
> less than 5 KW on long range and the distance between the radiator and
> helmsman is around 10 ft and when rotating at 24 rpm the helmsman is in the
> zone 14% of the time, so the average power exposure is still 700 watts at
> the Slot Line and 300 Watts at 10 ft. Still, that can't be healthy over
> time. Perhaps I did not do the math correctly, but that's what I came up
> with.
> Steve
Yep, you got that right Steve, You don't "Know"...... The Average Power
is not the Peak Pulse Power, but it IS, your Peak Pulse Power. * the
Pulse Length, * the Pulse Repetition Rate. Typically in a Marine Xband
10Kw Radar the Maximum Average Power is about 20 Watts, now if your 4
Foot slot-Line antenna has a Horizontal 3 db Beam-width of say 3°, then
divide that into 360°, and you are being sweeped less than 1% of the
time, so figure, now it is 2 Watts Average Power. Now figure that
Power is at the Magnetron and not the Antenna Face, so you lose, oh
say 1.5 db in the Waveguide, Rotary Joint, etc, so now your down to say
1.5 Watts, spread over the Face Antenna, which is 4Ft X 4" or 192 Sq
Inches, and 1.5 Watts spread over 192 Sq Inches, would be in the
neighborhood of 8 Milliwatts per Square Inch, as the Output Power
Density for the Typical 10Kw Marine Xband Radar, at the Antenna Face.
Now if one figures the Inverse Square Law into Distance from the Antenna
Face, the Power Density is even LESS significant..... Like I said do the
MATH, and it becomes a Non-Issue.... You get more Non-Ionizing radiation
from the Sun, on a Cloudless day, by FAR......
--
Bruce in alaska
add <path> after <fast> to reply >> Stay informed about: Koden radars? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 11, 2007 Posts: 225
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:52 am
Post subject: Re: Koden radars? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:28:27 GMT, Bruce in alaska <fast DeleteThis @btpost.net>
wrote:
>Now if one figures the Inverse Square Law into Distance from the Antenna
>Face, the Power Density is even LESS significant.....
To be pedantic, the inverse square law only applies to point sources,
which the antenna is not at some of the distances under discussion.
At a distance of, say, twenty times the source diameter,or more, the
inverse square law is a fair approximation, as the antenna is more
nearly a point source.
Casady >> Stay informed about: Koden radars? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 04, 2008 Posts: 28
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Koden radars? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <4790ae95.538097953 DeleteThis @news.east.earthlink.net>,
richardcasady DeleteThis @earthlink.net (Richard Casady) wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:28:27 GMT, Bruce in alaska <fast DeleteThis @btpost.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Now if one figures the Inverse Square Law into Distance from the Antenna
> >Face, the Power Density is even LESS significant.....
>
> To be pedantic, the inverse square law only applies to point sources,
> which the antenna is not at some of the distances under discussion.
> At a distance of, say, twenty times the source diameter,or more, the
> inverse square law is a fair approximation, as the antenna is more
> nearly a point source.
>
> Casady
True, it is the Near Field/Far Field reference.... but all the same,
the RF Power Density of a Marine Xband Radar is not a biologic concern.
Your much more likely to be hurt, by the rotating antenna hitting you
in the head, and falling off the ladder than the RF radiating from the
antenna.
Bruce in alaska
--
Bruce in alaska
add <path> after <fast> to reply >> Stay informed about: Koden radars? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Koden MD-3600 Radar - Group, I've started back into marine electronics fitting and repair again. We have an older scanner MRT-136) that is part of an MD-3600 radar system. The radome got wet (yes Larry other manufacturers do get wet from time to time). The owner want's us...
AIS Compatability with Furuno Radars and Nobeltec Admiral .. - I have 2 Furuno radars on board and use Nobeltec Admiral. I want to add full AIS. Nobeltec offers receive only unit. I've been advised that Simrad has excellent AIS unit. Will that interface with my Furuno Radar also? Do I want it to? I am I better....
FS: SPARES FOR 50KW MARINE RADARS MAGNETRONS SCANNER MOTOR.. - I have the following radar parts available: JRC 2J55 Magnetron 50KW (qty - 5, condition NEW) JRC 2J70B Magnetron 50KW (qty - 3, condition NEW) RAYTHEON 166254-1 Magnetron 50KW (qty - 1, condition NEW) RAYTHEON ANTENNA SCANNER MOTOR (antenna pedestal),....
Combining multiple VHFs on single ant - I have a VHF installed in our cabin with only a remote speaker in cockpit. Instead of replacing the unit with a newer VHF with remote mic and/or station options, I would like to simply add another standard VHF radio at the helm and share the antenna..
2 VHFs sharing 1 VHF antenna - I have an Apelco VHF mounted in the nav station with a remote speaker in the cockpit. A Raymarine handheld is kept near the helm. Of course the handheld has nowhere near the range of the fixed VHF below. Instead of replacing the [perfectly good] Apleco.. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|