Good god, you posting about dinners!

JohnH wrote:
 > On 24 Jan 2005 15:28:23 GMT, floridakeyz DeleteThis @aol.com (Florida Keyz)
wrote:
 >
  > >Ha!
 >
 > Read the post, dipshit, it was much more fishing related than yours!
 >
 > John H
Ah, so you DO find it intelligent to call people petty names, huh?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

On 25 Jan 2005 10:10:33 -0800, "basskisser" <atl_man2.DeleteThis@yahoo.com>
wrote:

 >
 >JohnH wrote:
  >> On 24 Jan 2005 15:28:23 GMT, floridakeyz.DeleteThis@aol.com (Florida Keyz)
 >wrote:
  >>
   >> >Ha!
  >>
  >> Read the post, dipshit, it was much more fishing related than yours!
  >>
  >> John H
 >Ah, so you DO find it intelligent to call people petty names, huh?

That's twice. Couldn't help myself either time. Glad you're there to
remind me to exercise better manners. Harry is still a fucking liar,
however.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

this post is not archived.
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

"Harry Krause" <piedtypecase.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:P6adnbGUPpFCL2vcRVn-oA@comcast.com...
 > JohnH wrote:
  > > On 25 Jan 2005 10:10:33 -0800, "basskisser" <atl_man2.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com>
  > > wrote:
  > >
  > >
   > >>JohnH wrote:
   > >>
   > >>>On 24 Jan 2005 15:28:23 GMT, floridakeyz.TakeThisOut@aol.com (Florida Keyz)
   > >>
   > >>wrote:
   > >>
   > >>>>Ha!
   > >>>
   > >>>Read the post, dipshit, it was much more fishing related than yours!
   > >>>
   > >>>John H
   > >>
   > >>Ah, so you DO find it intelligent to call people petty names, huh?
  > >
  > >
  > > That's twice. Couldn't help myself either time. Glad you're there to
  > > remind me to exercise better manners. Harry is still a fucking liar,
  > > however.
  > >
  > > John H
  > >
  > >
 >
 > Awwww...da widdle retired soldier boy is sooooooo upset....awwwwwwwwwwww.

Harry is so bitter on the newsgroups as he gets no F---ing.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

krause

You claimed to have been in nam,,, you lied,, there is no record of you in
nam,, nothing,,,

you lied again,,, (wow,, surprised),,, shit krause,, your lies just become
part of your life,,, not even a big deal anymore when you lie krause as it
happens so frequently,,

krause,, go visit your mom today,,, I am sure she is some how wondering if
she has any children,,, think about your own children there krause,, the
ones who left you ,, promising never to associate with you again,,, AS YOU
SAID,,, think of poor old toothless mom over there on the west coast of
florida in the cheapest home you could find for her,,, go visit your mom
krause,,,, I am not saying to sleep with her,,or have sex with her as you
said about my mom,, just go visit the old gal,,, take her out fishing on
your boats,,,









"Harry Krause" <piedtypecase.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:P6adnbGUPpFCL2vcRVn-oA@comcast.com...
 > JohnH wrote:
  >> On 25 Jan 2005 10:10:33 -0800, "basskisser" <atl_man2.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com>
  >> wrote:
  >>
  >>
   >>>JohnH wrote:
   >>>
   >>>>On 24 Jan 2005 15:28:23 GMT, floridakeyz.TakeThisOut@aol.com (Florida Keyz)
   >>>
   >>>wrote:
   >>>
   >>>>>Ha!
   >>>>
   >>>>Read the post, dipshit, it was much more fishing related than yours!
   >>>>
   >>>>John H
   >>>
   >>>Ah, so you DO find it intelligent to call people petty names, huh?
  >>
  >>
  >> That's twice. Couldn't help myself either time. Glad you're there to
  >> remind me to exercise better manners. Harry is still a fucking liar,
  >> however.
  >>
  >> John H
  >>
 >
 > Awwww...da widdle retired soldier boy is sooooooo upset....awwwwwwwwwwww.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

Tuuuk wrote:
 > krause
 >
 > You claimed to have been in nam,,, you lied,, there is no record of
you in
 > nam,, nothing,,,

Tuuuk, please tell us just exactly what records you have researched to
come to that conclusion.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

Tuuuk wrote:
 > ok,,, asskisser,,, lets have a look,,,

Your childish name calling negates any validity.
 >
 > but please try and stay with the program,,,
 >
 > krause was not in nam,, its obvious,,, he lied,, does that surprise
you???
 > again,, please try and stay with the program,,,

Again, I've asked what PROOF you have that he was not in VietNam? Be
specific.
 >
 > also,, I believe I said there were no records of krause in nam,,, how
about
 > giving the head a shake for us,,, here is why,,,

What records have you researched? Again, be specific.
 >
 > Who did the research?? did you?? I made the comment,, and I made it
from an
 > educated position,, here is why
 >
 > At least 10 different people on this group have called krause a
liar,,
 > probably you to,,, If not more,, I personally call him a liar,, as I
have
 > caught him in well over a dozen lies,, Not to mention the
probabilities of
 > my accuracy in my statement you question,,, but in your country you
are
 > innocent until proven guilty,, so if you think your smart,, you prove
my
 > statement wrong,,, lol,,,, hint,,, that would make you my puppet and
krause
 > might not appreciate you doing that,,,

So, in your ignorance, you think you have "caught" him in lies? Again,
please be specific, and detailed. When you state what he has lied
about, tell me what evidence you have to the contrary.
 >
 > So asskisser,,, please try and stick with the program,,, it is
clearly
 > obvious the man is a lier,,, what are you ,,,,blind???
See above.
 >
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

JohnH wrote:
 > On 27 Jan 2005 05:41:28 -0800, "basskisser" <atl_man2.DeleteThis@yahoo.com>
 > wrote:
 >
  > >
  > >Tuuuk wrote:
   > >> ok,,, asskisser,,, lets have a look,,,
  > >
  > >Your childish name calling negates any validity.
   > >>
   > >> but please try and stay with the program,,,
   > >>
   > >> krause was not in nam,, its obvious,,, he lied,, does that
surprise
  > >you???
   > >> again,, please try and stay with the program,,,
  > >
  > >Again, I've asked what PROOF you have that he was not in VietNam? Be
  > >specific.
   > >>
   > >> also,, I believe I said there were no records of krause in nam,,,
how
  > >about
   > >> giving the head a shake for us,,, here is why,,,
  > >
  > >What records have you researched? Again, be specific.
   > >>
   > >> Who did the research?? did you?? I made the comment,, and I made
it
  > >from an
   > >> educated position,, here is why
   > >>
   > >> At least 10 different people on this group have called krause a
  > >liar,,
   > >> probably you to,,, If not more,, I personally call him a liar,, as
I
  > >have
   > >> caught him in well over a dozen lies,, Not to mention the
  > >probabilities of
   > >> my accuracy in my statement you question,,, but in your country
you
  > >are
   > >> innocent until proven guilty,, so if you think your smart,, you
prove
  > >my
   > >> statement wrong,,, lol,,,, hint,,, that would make you my puppet
and
  > >krause
   > >> might not appreciate you doing that,,,
  > >
  > >So, in your ignorance, you think you have "caught" him in lies?
Again,
  > >please be specific, and detailed. When you state what he has lied
  > >about, tell me what evidence you have to the contrary.
   > >>
   > >> So asskisser,,, please try and stick with the program,,, it is
  > >clearly
   > >> obvious the man is a lier,,, what are you ,,,,blind???
  > >See above.
   > >>
   > >>
   > >>
 >
 > Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam.

Show me where he said that.

 > John H

Perhaps before you call others liars, you should learn to not spin what
others have stated.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

JohnH wrote:
 > On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
 > <piedtypecase DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
 >
  > >JohnH wrote:
   > >>
   > >>
   > >> Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification
of
   > >> remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he
was
   > >> not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what
one
   > >> is).
   > >>
   > >> The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a
liar.
   > >> There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them.
   > >>
   > >> John H
   > >>
  > >
  > >No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part
of a
  > >group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process,
and
  > >arrange for retrieval.
  > >
  > >Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably
  > >stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked.
 >
 > You're a liar, Krause.
 >
 > John H
 >
Speaking of liars, John, are you going to show me where Harry said that
he "identified bodies" in VietNam, as you previously stated in this
thread?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

JohnH wrote:
 > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" <Me RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote:
 >
  > >
  > >"JohnH" <notavailable RemoveThis @here.com> wrote in message
  > >news:prfkv09ec146bvu1ipqoklrk18gbbp8k92@4ax.com...
   > >> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
   > >> <piedtypecase RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
   > >>
   > >>>JohnH wrote:
   > >>>> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
   > >>>> <piedtypecase RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
   > >>>>
   > >>>>
   > >>>>>JohnH wrote:
   > >>>>>
   > >>>>>>On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
   > >>>>>><piedtypecase RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
   > >>>>>>
   > >>>>>>
   > >>>>>>
   > >>>>>>>JohnH wrote:
   > >>>>>>>
   > >>>>>>>
   > >>>>>>>>Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
   > >>>>>>>>remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause
stated he was
   > >>>>>>>>not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know
what one
   > >>>>>>>>is).
   > >>>>>>>>
   > >>>>>>>>The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is
a liar.
   > >>>>>>>>There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed
them.
   > >>>>>>>>
   > >>>>>>>>John H
   > >>>>>>>>
   > >>>>>>>
   > >>>>>>>No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was
part of
   > >>>>>>>a
   > >>>>>>>group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification
process, and
   > >>>>>>>arrange for retrieval.
   > >>>>>>>
   > >>>>>>>Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll
probably
   > >>>>>>>stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked.
   > >>>>>>
   > >>>>>>
   > >>>>>>You're a liar, Krause.
   > >>>>>>
   > >>>>>>John H
   > >>>>>
   > >>>>>You're a pathetic failure.
   > >>>>
   > >>>>
   > >>>> Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than
attempted
   > >>>> nothing and lied about it.
   > >>>>
   > >>>> You're a fucking liar, Krause.
   > >>>>
   > >>>> John H
   > >>>
   > >>>
   > >>>You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life,
got
   > >>>drafted, and stayed in the Army.
   > >>
   > >> You think your opinion matters, you fucking liar? I'm glad not to
held
   > >> highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.
   > >>
   > >> John H
   > >>
   > >> On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
   > >> on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!
   > >>
   > >> "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to
   > >> resolve it."
   > >> Rene Descartes
  > >
  > >John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and
move on.
  > >No need wasting more time with the fool.
  > >
 >
 > I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every
 > post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a
 > fucking liar, Krause."
 >
 > He has earned that response.He deserves the same shit he dishes out.
 > He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's
 > just to read that he's a fucking, despicable liar.
 >
 > He is *worthy* of that comment.
 >
 > [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause
 > post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything
 > meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is
a
 > liar.]
 >
 > John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

JohnH wrote:
 > On 31 Jan 2005 09:49:03 -0800, "basskisser" <atl_man2.DeleteThis@yahoo.com>
 > wrote:
 >
  > >
  > >JohnH wrote:
   > >> On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser" <atl_man2.DeleteThis@yahoo.com>
   > >> wrote:
   > >>
   > >> >
   > >> >JohnH wrote:
   > >> >> On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser"
<atl_man2.DeleteThis@yahoo.com>
   > >> >> wrote:
   > >> >>
   > >> >> >
   > >> >> >JohnH wrote:
   > >> >> >> On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"
  > ><atl_man2.DeleteThis@yahoo.com>
   > >> >> >> wrote:
   > >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >
   > >> >> >> >JohnH wrote:
   > >> >> >> >> On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"
   > >> ><atl_man2.DeleteThis@yahoo.com>
   > >> >> >> >> wrote:
   > >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >
   > >> >> >> >> >JohnH wrote:
   > >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH"
<Me.DeleteThis@aol.com>
   > >> >wrote:
   > >> >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >
   > >> >> >> >> >> >"JohnH" <notavailable.DeleteThis@here.com> wrote in message
   > >> >> >> >> >> >news:prfkv09ec146bvu1ipqoklrk18gbbp8k92@4ax.com...
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> <piedtypecase.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>JohnH wrote:
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>> <piedtypecase.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>JohnH wrote:
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>><piedtypecase.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>JohnH wrote:
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam.
  > >The
   > >> >> >> >> >identification of
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>remains is a mission of military mortuary
units.
   > >> >Krause
   > >> >> >> >> >stated he was
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably
doesn't
   > >> >even
   > >> >> >> >know
   > >> >> >> >> >what one
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>is).
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>The valid conclusion is that Krause has no
   > >> >credibility.
   > >> >> >He
   > >> >> >> >is
   > >> >> >> >> >a liar.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>There are other examples. Search for yourself
if
  > >you
   > >> >> >> >missed
   > >> >> >> >> >them.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>John H
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified
bodies.
  > >I
   > >> >said
   > >> >> >I
   > >> >> >> >was
   > >> >> >> >> >part of
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>a
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>group that helped locate them, *start* an
   > >> >> >indentification
   > >> >> >> >> >process, and
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>arrange for retrieval.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or
later,
   > >> >you'll
   > >> >> >> >> >probably
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>stumble across the name of the outfit for which
I
   > >> >> >worked.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>You're a liar, Krause.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>John H
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>You're a pathetic failure.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and
  > >failed
   > >> >> >than
   > >> >> >> >> >attempted
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>> nothing and lied about it.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>> You're a fucking liar, Krause.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>> John H
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a
  > >failure
   > >> >in
   > >> >> >> >life,
   > >> >> >> >> >got
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>drafted, and stayed in the Army.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> You think your opinion matters, you fucking liar?
I'm
   > >> >glad
   > >> >> >not
   > >> >> >> >to
   > >> >> >> >> >held
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> John H
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is
  > >feasible
   > >> >> >and
   > >> >> >> >> >necessary to
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> resolve it."
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> Rene Descartes
   > >> >> >> >> >> >
   > >> >> >> >> >> >John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless.
  > >Killfile
   > >> >him
   > >> >> >and
   > >> >> >> >> >move on.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >No need wasting more time with the fool.
   > >> >> >> >> >> >
   > >> >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >> I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate
  > >response
   > >> >to
   > >> >> >> >every
   > >> >> >> >> >> post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause
post
  > >is,
   > >> >> >> >"You're a
   > >> >> >> >> >> fucking liar, Krause."
   > >> >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >> He has earned that response.He deserves the same shit
he
   > >> >dishes
   > >> >> >> >out.
   > >> >> >> >> >> He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print,
  > >even
   > >> >if
   > >> >> >it's
   > >> >> >> >> >> just to read that he's a fucking, despicable liar.
   > >> >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >> He is *worthy* of that comment.
   > >> >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >> [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name
following
  > >up
   > >> >a
   > >> >> >> >Krause
   > >> >> >> >> >> post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in
   > >> >anything
   > >> >> >> >> >> meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful
   > >> >discussion.
   > >> >> >He
   > >> >> >> >is
   > >> >> >> >> >a
   > >> >> >> >> >> liar.]
   > >> >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >> John H
   > >> >> >> >> >
   > >> >> >> >> >Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said
that
  > >he
   > >> >> >> >> >"identified bodies" in VietNam.
   > >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a fucking liar.
Glad
   > >> >you've
   > >> >> >> >> finally unplugged your head and seen the light.
   > >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> John H
   > >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >John, would you say that, if someone posted here that
someone
   > >> >said
   > >> >> >> >something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the
poster
  > >was
   > >> >a
   > >> >> >> >liar?
   > >> >> >>
   > >> >> >Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar
  > >would
   > >> >not.
   > >> >>
   > >> >> Who made the error?
   > >> >>
   > >> >> John H
   > >> >
   > >> >John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made
an
   > >> >error.
   > >>
   > >> Where?
   > >>
   > >> John H
  > >
  > >Right here, John. You stated that you WEREN'T a liar, then said
this:
  > >
  > >There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar h­ere.
His
  > >name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just br­azenly
  > >lies.
  > >John H
  > >
  > >So, which is it, you are either a liar, or made an error.
 >
 > Nothing erroneous there, except punctuation.
 >
Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have
stated.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

JohnH wrote:
 > On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser" <atl_man2 DeleteThis @yahoo.com>
wrote:
 >
  > >
  > >JohnH wrote:
   > >> On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser" <atl_man2 DeleteThis @yahoo.com>
  > >wrote:
   > >>
   > >> >
   > >> >JohnH wrote:
   > >> >> On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser" <atl_man2 DeleteThis @yahoo.com>
   > >> >wrote:
   > >> >>
   > >> >> >
   > >> >> >JohnH wrote:
   > >> >> >> On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
  > ><atl_man2 DeleteThis @yahoo.com>
   > >> >> >> wrote:
   > >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >
   > >> >> >> >JohnH wrote:
   > >> >> >> >> On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"
   > >> ><atl_man2 DeleteThis @yahoo.com>
   > >> >> >> >> wrote:
   > >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> >Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,
then
   > >> >please
   > >> >> >> >post
   > >> >> >> >> >where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",
as
   > >> >you
   > >> >> >have
   > >> >> >> >> >stated.
   > >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> Did he not say that?
   > >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >> John H
   > >> >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> >Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?
After
   > >> >all,
   > >> >> >you
   > >> >> >> >are the one who stated that he said so.
   > >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
   > >> >Vietnam
   > >> >> >> activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?
Maybe
  > >you
   > >> >> >> read it and forgot.
   > >> >> >>
   > >> >> >> John H
   > >> >> >The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one
who
  > >made
   > >> >> >the allegation. Prove it.
   > >> >> >
   > >> >> >You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.
   > >> >>
   > >> >> Well, what do you think he said?
   > >> >>
   > >> >> John H
   > >> >>
   > >> >I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
  > >that
   > >> >he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.
   > >>
   > >> Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably
around
   > >> somewhere.
   > >>
   > >> John H
  > >
  > >Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that
he
  > >said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
  > >fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were
erroneous.
  > >Which is it?
 >
 > Prove what he said.
 >
 > John H
 >
Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he "identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that subject.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners! 

this post is not archived.
 >> Stay informed about: Good god, you posting about dinners!