Good Morning Harry Krause

On Aug 17, 10:13 pm, hk <payer33... RemoveThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
> camacdonaldiii wrote:
> > On Aug 17, 6:28 pm, hk <payer33... RemoveThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
> >> camacdonaldiii wrote:
> >>> On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK <intrcep... RemoveThis @123gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> thun... RemoveThis @TAKEOUTgti.net wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
> >>>>>> Don't bet on it.  If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
> >>>>>> quickly.  I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
> >>>>> Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
> >>>> WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.
> >>> I'm posting under my own name.  So Harry has to prove his statements
> >>> accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
> >>> to do so.  If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
> >>> of a real person.
> >> Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
> >> the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
> >> what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
> >> the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
> >> you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.
>
> >> Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.
>
> > Your first communication from my sister and attorney, Harry, will be
> > via the deputy sheriff who will be serving you papers.  If you try to
> > avoid service by getting crafty, then the responsibility will be
> > turned over to a private investigator/process server who will drop the
> > papers on you.  Cheers, Dude.
>
> I notice you've stopped lying about me. Too late: I've saved each and
> every one of them. Did your seeeeeester tell you to start behaving properly?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No one lies more about you than.........YOU.....
Lobster boat
Dad's trans-Atlantic trip in a runabout
Ensuing fireboat welcome in NYC
Single handing around the horn
Sailing from SF to Hawaii
to name a few.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 18, 8:23 am, LoogyPic....DeleteThis@gmail.com wrote:
> On Aug 17, 10:13 pm, hk <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > camacdonaldiii wrote:
> > > On Aug 17, 6:28 pm, hk <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
> > >> camacdonaldiii wrote:
> > >>> On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK <intrcep....DeleteThis@123gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> thun....DeleteThis@TAKEOUTgti.net wrote:
> > >>>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
> > >>>>>> Don't bet on it.  If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
> > >>>>>> quickly.  I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
> > >>>>> Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
> > >>>> WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.
> > >>> I'm posting under my own name.  So Harry has to prove his statements
> > >>> accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
> > >>> to do so.  If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
> > >>> of a real person.
> > >> Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
> > >> the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
> > >> what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
> > >> the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
> > >> you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.
>
> > >> Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.
>
> > > Your first communication from my sister and attorney, Harry, will be
> > > via the deputy sheriff who will be serving you papers.  If you try to
> > > avoid service by getting crafty, then the responsibility will be
> > > turned over to a private investigator/process server who will drop the
> > > papers on you.  Cheers, Dude.
>
> > I notice you've stopped lying about me. Too late: I've saved each and
> > every one of them. Did your seeeeeester tell you to start behaving properly?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> No one lies more about you than.........YOU.....
> Lobster boat
> Dad's trans-Atlantic trip in a runabout
> Ensuing fireboat welcome in NYC
> Single handing around the horn
> Sailing from SF to Hawaii
> to name a few.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

If your sister really advises pursuing this that doesn't rate well for
the quality of her advise. Such a suit is practically unwinable not
matter what Harry has done in usenet.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 18, 8:36 am, JamesGan... DeleteThis @gmail.com wrote:
> On Aug 18, 8:23 am, LoogyPic... DeleteThis @gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 17, 10:13 pm, hk <payer33... DeleteThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
>
> > > camacdonaldiii wrote:
> > > > On Aug 17, 6:28 pm, hk <payer33... DeleteThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
> > > >> camacdonaldiii wrote:
> > > >>> On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK <intrcep... DeleteThis @123gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>> thun... DeleteThis @TAKEOUTgti.net wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
> > > >>>>>> Don't bet on it.  If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
> > > >>>>>> quickly.  I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
> > > >>>>> Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
> > > >>>> WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.
> > > >>> I'm posting under my own name.  So Harry has to prove his statements
> > > >>> accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
> > > >>> to do so.  If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
> > > >>> of a real person.
> > > >> Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
> > > >> the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
> > > >> what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
> > > >> the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
> > > >> you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.
>
> > > >> Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.
>
> > > > Your first communication from my sister and attorney, Harry, will be
> > > > via the deputy sheriff who will be serving you papers.  If you try to
> > > > avoid service by getting crafty, then the responsibility will be
> > > > turned over to a private investigator/process server who will drop the
> > > > papers on you.  Cheers, Dude.
>
> > > I notice you've stopped lying about me. Too late: I've saved each and
> > > every one of them. Did your seeeeeester tell you to start behaving properly?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > No one lies more about you than.........YOU.....
> > Lobster boat
> > Dad's trans-Atlantic trip in a runabout
> > Ensuing fireboat welcome in NYC
> > Single handing around the horn
> > Sailing from SF to Hawaii
> > to name a few.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> If your sister really advises pursuing this that doesn't rate well for
> the quality of her advise.  Such a suit is practically unwinable not
> matter what Harry has done in usenet.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

*I* don't have a sister!!
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 18, 7:36 am, JamesGan....RemoveThis@gmail.com wrote:
> On Aug 18, 8:23 am, LoogyPic....RemoveThis@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 17, 10:13 pm, hk <payer33....RemoveThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
>
> > > camacdonaldiii wrote:
> > > > On Aug 17, 6:28 pm, hk <payer33....RemoveThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
> > > >> camacdonaldiii wrote:
> > > >>> On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK <intrcep....RemoveThis@123gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>> thun....RemoveThis@TAKEOUTgti.net wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
> > > >>>>>> Don't bet on it.  If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
> > > >>>>>> quickly.  I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
> > > >>>>> Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
> > > >>>> WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.
> > > >>> I'm posting under my own name.  So Harry has to prove his statements
> > > >>> accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
> > > >>> to do so.  If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
> > > >>> of a real person.
> > > >> Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
> > > >> the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
> > > >> what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
> > > >> the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
> > > >> you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.
>
> > > >> Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.
>
> > > > Your first communication from my sister and attorney, Harry, will be
> > > > via the deputy sheriff who will be serving you papers.  If you try to
> > > > avoid service by getting crafty, then the responsibility will be
> > > > turned over to a private investigator/process server who will drop the
> > > > papers on you.  Cheers, Dude.
>
> > > I notice you've stopped lying about me. Too late: I've saved each and
> > > every one of them. Did your seeeeeester tell you to start behaving properly?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > No one lies more about you than.........YOU.....
> > Lobster boat
> > Dad's trans-Atlantic trip in a runabout
> > Ensuing fireboat welcome in NYC
> > Single handing around the horn
> > Sailing from SF to Hawaii
> > to name a few.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> If your sister really advises pursuing this that doesn't rate well for
> the quality of her advise (sic).  Such a suit is practically unwinable not (sic)
> matter what Harry has done in usenet.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

She has cited some very recent cases to the contrary. In any event,
it will be fun to get The Fat One under oath. As soon as the action
is properly drafted, filed and served upon Harry, it will become a
matter of public record. Then I'll be able to post a link here to it
for anyone that might be interested. Until then, I'm going to be
properly cautious about commenting upon it.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 18, 9:04 am, hk <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
> camacdonaldiii wrote:
> > On Aug 18, 7:36 am, JamesGan....DeleteThis@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> If your sister really advises pursuing this that doesn't rate well for
> >> the quality of her advise (sic).  Such a suit is practically unwinable not (sic)
> >> matter what Harry has done in usenet.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> Her brother, if she exists, put up a post advising someone not to go out
> for a boat ride with me because I "was dangerous." There literally are
> dozens of posts from "camac" in which he libels me. Apparently "camac"
> likes to dish it out, but he can't take it, and has to go running to his
> seeeeeester for help.  :>)

"Dangerous" is subjective, while accusing someone of specific crimes
against children is libelous.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 18, 8:56 am, camacdonaldiii <camacdonald... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 18, 7:36 am, JamesGan... DeleteThis @gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 18, 8:23 am, LoogyPic... DeleteThis @gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 17, 10:13 pm, hk <payer33... DeleteThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
>
> > > > camacdonaldiii wrote:
> > > > > On Aug 17, 6:28 pm, hk <payer33... DeleteThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
> > > > >> camacdonaldiii wrote:
> > > > >>> On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK <intrcep... DeleteThis @123gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>> thun... DeleteThis @TAKEOUTgti.net wrote:
> > > > >>>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> Don't bet on it.  If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
> > > > >>>>>> quickly.  I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
> > > > >>>>> Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
> > > > >>>> WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.
> > > > >>> I'm posting under my own name.  So Harry has to prove his statements
> > > > >>> accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
> > > > >>> to do so.  If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
> > > > >>> of a real person.
> > > > >> Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
> > > > >> the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
> > > > >> what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
> > > > >> the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
> > > > >> you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.
>
> > > > >> Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.
>
> > > > > Your first communication from my sister and attorney, Harry, will be
> > > > > via the deputy sheriff who will be serving you papers.  If you try to
> > > > > avoid service by getting crafty, then the responsibility will be
> > > > > turned over to a private investigator/process server who will drop the
> > > > > papers on you.  Cheers, Dude.
>
> > > > I notice you've stopped lying about me. Too late: I've saved each and
> > > > every one of them. Did your seeeeeester tell you to start behaving properly?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > No one lies more about you than.........YOU.....
> > > Lobster boat
> > > Dad's trans-Atlantic trip in a runabout
> > > Ensuing fireboat welcome in NYC
> > > Single handing around the horn
> > > Sailing from SF to Hawaii
> > > to name a few.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > If your sister really advises pursuing this that doesn't rate well for
> > the quality of her advise (sic).  Such a suit is practically unwinable not (sic)
> > matter what Harry has done in usenet.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> She has cited some very recent cases to the contrary.  In any event,
> it will be fun to get The Fat One under oath.  As soon as the action
> is properly drafted, filed and served upon Harry, it will become a
> matter of public record.  Then I'll be able to post a link here to it
> for anyone that might be interested.  Until then, I'm going to be
> properly cautious about commenting upon it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Please keep us posted.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 18, 10:46 am, hk <payer33... DeleteThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
> sa... DeleteThis @dog.com wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:21:49 -0400, John H.
> > <salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom> wrote:
>
> >> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:12:10 -0400, sa... DeleteThis @dog.com wrote:
>
> >>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:17:12 -0400, John H.
> >>> <salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom> wrote:
>
> >>>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:58:46 -0400, TJ <T... DeleteThis @invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
> >>>>> John H. wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Giving everyone $1000 is a good start towards fixing those problems. If,
> >>>>>> after that, the problems still exist, Obama will probably give everyone
> >>>>>> $2000. For sure, the problems will go away then.
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> ** Good Day! **
> >>>>> As I said, I'm just a simple country boy. You need to explain things
> >>>>> more fully, or I don't understand them. Assuming by "everyone" you mean
> >>>>> all 300 million or so Americans, That could come to as much as, uh let
> >>>>> me see... Wait a minute, my calculator doesn't go that high, I need a
> >>>>> pencil... Ah! I get $9 trillion. Sounds like a bargain to me, although I
> >>>>> don't see how it would work. The $600 Bush gave almost everyone only
> >>>>> helped during one quarter.
>
> >>>>> Exactly where do you expect them to get that money? Should they just
> >>>>> print it up? From what I heard, that would devalue our falling dollar
> >>>>> even more than it is now, and that $3000 would have less power than it
> >>>>> might have. They could borrow it from China or somebody, but wouldn't
> >>>>> that increase the deficit even more? Doesn't sound like a good way to
> >>>>> balance the budget. If I did something lie that, I'd hear nasty things
> >>>> >from my banker. But then, I'm not the government, am I?
> >>>>> Hmmm. I'm not so sure about that one, but we'll put it on the list.
> >>>>> Anybody got any other ideas?
>
> >>>>> TJ
> >>>> Where does Obama get the money? From the same place Pelosi or Reid would
> >>>> get the money. Taxes. Higher taxes. Income redistribution on  a grand
> >>>> scale.
> >>> Ya mean like the $1200 that Bush recently sent everybody? Bush simply
> >>> borrowed the money from China. He knows you are good for it, or maybe
> >>> your children and grandchildren will settle up...
> >> Bush sent me nothing, and I'm part of everybody.
>
> > No, tax cheats who don't file a return, are part of a smaller
> > sub-group.
>
> Herring is retired. If memory serves, you had to have earned income to
> get the tax rebate. Your tax dollars are paying for Herring's
> retirement, too.
>
> There's something about Herring's sort of aimless hobby-filled
> retirement -a type of retirement apparently shared by several posters
> here- that would drive me batty. Not having anything to do but engage in
> self-indulgent hobbies...seems mindless to me. I don't even like
> "vacations" that last more than a week.
>
> Whatever one thinks of Jimmy Carter, one has to admire many of his
> "retirement" activities that are aimed at helping the less fortunate.
> My father in law, retired, is a lifelong conservative Republican, but he
> says Carter is his model for "doing good for others" in retirement.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Part of John's compensation for his services to our country (besides
the low pay) is health care, and other compensations for retirement.
It's just that simple. He worked for it, he deserves it. Whether you
or I agree with it, he knew he had it coming, and I'm sure that was
part of his decision to make the military a career.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 18, 11:27 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
<nospample... DeleteThis @here.com> wrote:
> hk wrote:

> > My wife asked me this past weekend if I ever intended to "retire." My
> > answer: "Why would I want to do *that*?"

>
> Why don't you take off 1 day a week from rec.boats and volunteer for
> something, anything.

Hear, hear!!
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

camacdonaldiii wrote:
> On Aug 18, 7:36 am, JamesGan... DeleteThis @gmail.com wrote:
>
>> If your sister really advises pursuing this that doesn't rate well for
>> the quality of her advise (sic). Such a suit is practically unwinable not (sic)
>> matter what Harry has done in usenet.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -


Her brother, if she exists, put up a post advising someone not to go out
for a boat ride with me because I "was dangerous." There literally are
dozens of posts from "camac" in which he libels me. Apparently "camac"
likes to dish it out, but he can't take it, and has to go running to his
seeeeeester for help. :>)
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

hk wrote:
> camacdonaldiii wrote:
>> On Aug 18, 7:36 am, JamesGan... DeleteThis @gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> If your sister really advises pursuing this that doesn't rate well for
>>> the quality of her advise (sic). Such a suit is practically
>>> unwinable not (sic)
>>> matter what Harry has done in usenet.- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
> Her brother, if she exists, put up a post advising someone not to go out
> for a boat ride with me because I "was dangerous." There literally are
> dozens of posts from "camac" in which he libels me. Apparently "camac"
> likes to dish it out, but he can't take it, and has to go running to his
> seeeeeester for help. :>)
>
>

It does look like Gene's server needs tweaking if it will be able to
really be a productive filter.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 18, 11:22 am, hk <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
> Eisboch wrote:
> > "hk" <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote in message
> >news:G8GdnVMbGaCgFjTVnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> >> There's something about Herring's sort of aimless hobby-filled
> >> retirement -a type of retirement apparently shared by several posters
> >> here- that would drive me batty. Not having anything to do but engage in
> >> self-indulgent hobbies...seems mindless to me. I don't even like
> >> "vacations" that last more than a week.
>
> > You may feel better if and when you ever get a sense of accomplishment or
> > satisfaction of your efforts in life.
> > Meanwhile, keep trying.
>
> > Eisboch
>
> That's not it at all. It's the utter mindlessness and laziness of it
> that I don't like, as in, "Oh...it's Thursday...it's golf day," instead
> of, "Oh...it's Thursday...it's my day to cook meals for the needy down
> at the shelter," or tutor some kids, or something like that. Not that
> retirees should spend every day helping others, but, if they are
> physically able and reasonably well off, I think at least a couple of
> days a week devoted to helping those who most need it is the mark of
> someone who is not entirely self-indulgent.
>
> My wife asked me this past weekend if I ever intended to "retire." My
> answer: "Why would I want to do *that*?"- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Mindlessness and laziness? I know many, many people who are retired
and more active than they ever were when working. You must sure have a
miserable life elsewhere if all you want to do is work.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 18, 11:27 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
<nospample....DeleteThis@here.com> wrote:
> hk wrote:
> > Eisboch wrote:
> >> "hk" <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote in message
> >>news:G8GdnVMbGaCgFjTVnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> >>> There's something about Herring's sort of aimless hobby-filled
> >>> retirement -a type of retirement apparently shared by several posters
> >>> here- that would drive me batty. Not having anything to do but engage
> >>> in self-indulgent hobbies...seems mindless to me. I don't even like
> >>> "vacations" that last more than a week.
>
> >> You may feel better if and when you ever get a sense of accomplishment
> >> or satisfaction of your efforts in life.
> >> Meanwhile, keep trying.
>
> >> Eisboch
>
> > That's not it at all. It's the utter mindlessness and laziness of it
> > that I don't like, as in, "Oh...it's Thursday...it's golf day," instead
> > of, "Oh...it's Thursday...it's my day to cook meals for the needy down
> > at the shelter," or tutor some kids, or something like that. Not that
> > retirees should spend every day helping others, but, if they are
> > physically able and reasonably well off, I think at least a couple of
> > days a week devoted to helping those who most need it is the mark of
> > someone who is not entirely self-indulgent.
>
> > My wife asked me this past weekend if I ever intended to "retire." My
> > answer: "Why would I want to do *that*?"
>
> Why don't you take off 1 day a week from rec.boats and volunteer for
> something, anything.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Hey, you once pointed someone here to a guys website that was very
informative about DSLR. I'd like to have that if you remember it. I
want to know more about the whole lens length thing versus 35mm slr.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:40:39 -0400, TJ <TJ.DeleteThis@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>hk wrote:
>
>>
>> You ought to be spending your time trying to find medical care and a way
>> to get your needed prescriptions at a price you can afford, instead of
>> drooling into rec.boats.
>>
>
>You know, that brings up a question that I have that nobody seems to be
>able to answer in a way that adds up. Of course, I'm just a simple
>country boy who doesn't know much about high finance, so maybe you can
>explain it to me.
>
>Medicare is just about to the point where it spends out more than it
>takes in, and Baby Boomers like me are going to break Social Security by
>the time we all retire if something drastic isn't done - and soon.
>Medicare could be called a sort of "universal health care" for the aged
>and the disabled. My question is simple: If the US taxpayers can't
>afford to provide health care to the aged and disabled, how the hell can
>we afford to provide it for EVERYBODY? And how can we do it while
>simultaneously balancing the budget, restoring the economy, defending
>the country, and switching everybody to more expensive "green" energy?
>
>Stopping the war might be enough to balance the budget, but it won't do
>the rest, too. Taxing the profits of oil companies until they all go
>bankrupt would be bad for the economy, and taxing just the rich won't
>help because they don't have enough money. Most of the money in this
>country is held by the middle class. Cutting government waste would
>help, but you'd have to cut ALL of the pet projects, not just the ones
>of the minority party, and that'll never happen, no matter which party
>is in power.
>
>So what is the Liberal Democrat solution? And I don't want to hear about
>all the things the Republicans have done wrong - I want to hear about
>what YOU'D DO. And those of you who are Conservatives, what would YOU
>do? I've asked these questions of several political animals, of several
>parties, and nobody's given me a straight answer that made any sense
>yet. Can any of you be the first?
>
>TJ

Giving everyone $1000 is a good start towards fixing those problems. If,
after that, the problems still exist, Obama will probably give everyone
$2000. For sure, the problems will go away then.
--
** Good Day! **

John H
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause