Good Morning Harry Krause

Richard Casady wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:32:59 -0400, hk <payer33859 DeleteThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
>
>> What think you of the cowards who post here "anonymously"?
>
> Try alt.folklore.urban where most have been posting under their real
> names for years, some for more than a decade. Handles are quite rare.
>
> Casady


At most of the places where I post seriously, the real identities of
virtually all posters are known to all the regulars. It's the cowardly
little schitts in rec.boats that are scared of squirting their shorts if
anyone ID's them properly.


--
If you want to talk boating or fishing, you're in the wrong place.
rec.boats is the domain of the Seven Little Schitts, who mostly
talk trash. The current members are "Reggie," Loogy, Florida Jim,
DK, BAR and JohnH, and alternates Mike and an occasional
floater.

Try thehulltruth.com or other properly moderated discussion boards
if you want to talk about boats.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 16, 9:40 pm, TJ <T... DeleteThis @invalid.invalid> wrote:
> hk wrote:
>
> > You ought to be spending your time trying to find medical care and a way
> > to get your needed prescriptions at a price you can afford, instead of
> > drooling into rec.boats.
>
> You know, that brings up a question that I have that nobody seems to be
> able to answer in a way that adds up. Of course, I'm just a simple
> country boy who doesn't know much about high finance, so maybe you can
> explain it to me.
>
> Medicare is just about to the point where it spends out more than it
> takes in, and Baby Boomers like me are going to break Social Security by
> the time we all retire if something drastic isn't done - and soon.
> Medicare could be called a sort of "universal health care" for the aged
> and the disabled. My question is simple: If the US taxpayers can't
> afford to provide health care to the aged and disabled, how the hell can
> we afford to provide it for EVERYBODY? And how can we do it while
> simultaneously balancing the budget, restoring the economy, defending
> the country, and switching everybody to more expensive "green" energy?
>
> Stopping the war might be enough to balance the budget, but it won't do
> the rest, too. Taxing the profits of oil companies until they all go
> bankrupt would be bad for the economy, and taxing just the rich won't
> help because they don't have enough money. Most of the money in this
> country is held by the middle class. Cutting government waste would
> help, but you'd have to cut ALL of the pet projects, not just the ones
> of the minority party, and that'll never happen, no matter which party
> is in power.
>
> So what is the Liberal Democrat solution? And I don't want to hear about
> all the things the Republicans have done wrong - I want to hear about
> what YOU'D DO. And those of you who are Conservatives, what would YOU
> do? I've asked these questions of several political animals, of several
> parties, and nobody's given me a straight answer that made any sense
> yet. Can any of you be the first?
>
> TJ

Thanks for bringing some means of sanity to the thread...
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

camacdonaldiii wrote:
> Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
> successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
> reviewed your statements in re: “camacdonald is on a list of felons
> convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
> zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
> exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
> subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
> Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
> you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
> of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
> wait!

Count me in for some of the fees.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
> hk wrote:
> .
>>
>> Don't forget to tell your sister of your months of lying insults
>> directed towards me, virtually all of which I ignored. And don't
>> forget, I have *all* of them saved, along with their headers, I'll be
>> glad to send these along to your sister, so she can see for herself
>> what a quality guy her brother is.
>
> This reminds me of when you used to to tell us you saved all of MadCow's
> posts on CD. You must have quiet a collection of CD's saved up. How
> many people do you "save" their post to protect yourself from lawsuits?
> It must take up a lot of your time that could be used for boating and
> fishing.
>

WAFA has no idea how the legal system works.

It you're reading this...and you ARE...one has NOTHING to do with the
other. Try a counter suit. Drop a few grand on that and kiss it goodbye.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

jamesgangnc wrote:
> Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
> sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality of
> her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
> target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
> enough to make her lose interest.
>
> "camacdonaldiii" <camacdonaldiii.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:8f90ff29-9a41-4551-b891-4163e7317a01@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
> successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
> reviewed your statements in re: “camacdonald is on a list of felons
> convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
> zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
> exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
> subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
> Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
> you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
> of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
> wait!
>
>

Don't bet on it. If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

camacdonaldiii wrote:
> On Aug 16, 10:42 am, LoogyPic... RemoveThis @gmail.com wrote:
>> On Aug 16, 9:56 am, "jamesgangnc" <ja... RemoveThis @nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
>>> sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality of
>>> her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
>>> target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
>>> enough to make her lose interest.
>>> "camacdonaldiii" <camacdonald... RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:8f90ff29-9a41-4551-b891-4163e7317a01@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>> Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
>>> successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
>>> reviewed your statements in re: “camacdonald is on a list of felons
>>> convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
>>> zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
>>> exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
>>> subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
>>> Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
>>> you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
>>> of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
>>> wait!
>> Some people would make Harry dance just for fun! It's about time, he's
>> slandered and defamed anybody and everybody who would dare call him
>> out on his hundreds of lies.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> And she said she would do an asset search Monday morning. Do you
> think she'll find the lobster boat?

Of course not. She may not even find that 1/2 interest in a canoe.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

Jim wrote:
>
> "jamesgangnc" <james DeleteThis @nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:oeydneiaEuYfajvVnZ2dnUVZ_q_inZ2d@earthlink.com...
>> "camacdonaldiii" <camacdonaldiii DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:7c9c0ab2-ad16-43c0-9c4c-009e88ef6758@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Aug 16, 8:56 am, "jamesgangnc" <ja... DeleteThis @nospam.com> wrote:
>>> Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
>>> sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the
>>> reality of
>>> her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
>>> target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
>>> enough to make her lose interest.
>>>
>>> "camacdonaldiii" <camacdonald... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:8f90ff29-9a41-4551-b891-4163e7317a01@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>> Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
>>> successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
>>> reviewed your statements in re: “camacdonald is on a list of felons
>>> convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
>>> zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
>>> exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
>>> subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
>>> Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
>>> you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
>>> of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
>>> wait!
>>>
>>> James, I'm bragging on family here, so I apologize. But my sister is
>>> very tenacious (especially where family is concerned) and an excellent
>>> plaintiff lawyer. She'll have The Fat One gnawing off his fingernails
>>> like a maniac.
>>
>> Then your sister is not as well versed in this area as you think.
>>
>> 1. You willingly participated in a public forum. That greatly
>> diminishes your protection under the laws.
>>
>> 2. You posted a great deal of subjective material yourself. A judge
>> can not rule upon any of this as a matter of fact. That means jury
>> trial.
>>
>> 3. Historically there is practically no successes for these sort of
>> cases in spite of the fact that the internet and usenet in particular
>> is rampant with this behavior.
>>
>> 4. If you even manage to win a case you would then have to prove real
>> damages. Personal feelings don't count. You need to show how this
>> has cost you money.
>>
>> 5. Losing such a case would in fact leave you open to counter claims
>> that would include real expenses incurred by the other party. You
>> could find yourself having to pay for his lawyer.
>>
>> Now has you sister informed you of all this? Tenacious has nothing to
>> do with it. It would take very little effort on the other party to
>> cause your sister to run up a great deal of time invested in a case
>> that is almost certainly unwinable.
>>
>>
> This guy is just blowing smoke. Harry is a very private person. No way
> could anyone here get his address or phone number without paying for it.

A simple ISP subpoena will take care of that.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

hk wrote:

>
> You ought to be spending your time trying to find medical care and a way
> to get your needed prescriptions at a price you can afford, instead of
> drooling into rec.boats.
>

You know, that brings up a question that I have that nobody seems to be
able to answer in a way that adds up. Of course, I'm just a simple
country boy who doesn't know much about high finance, so maybe you can
explain it to me.

Medicare is just about to the point where it spends out more than it
takes in, and Baby Boomers like me are going to break Social Security by
the time we all retire if something drastic isn't done - and soon.
Medicare could be called a sort of "universal health care" for the aged
and the disabled. My question is simple: If the US taxpayers can't
afford to provide health care to the aged and disabled, how the hell can
we afford to provide it for EVERYBODY? And how can we do it while
simultaneously balancing the budget, restoring the economy, defending
the country, and switching everybody to more expensive "green" energy?

Stopping the war might be enough to balance the budget, but it won't do
the rest, too. Taxing the profits of oil companies until they all go
bankrupt would be bad for the economy, and taxing just the rich won't
help because they don't have enough money. Most of the money in this
country is held by the middle class. Cutting government waste would
help, but you'd have to cut ALL of the pet projects, not just the ones
of the minority party, and that'll never happen, no matter which party
is in power.

So what is the Liberal Democrat solution? And I don't want to hear about
all the things the Republicans have done wrong - I want to hear about
what YOU'D DO. And those of you who are Conservatives, what would YOU
do? I've asked these questions of several political animals, of several
parties, and nobody's given me a straight answer that made any sense
yet. Can any of you be the first?

TJ
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:


> Don't bet on it. If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
> quickly. I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!

Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK <intrcep... RemoveThis @123gmail.com> wrote:
> thun... RemoveThis @TAKEOUTgti.net wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
>
> >> Don't bet on it.  If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
> >> quickly.  I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
>
> > Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
>
> WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.

I'm posting under my own name. So Harry has to prove his statements
accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
to do so. If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
of a real person.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

thunder.DeleteThis@TAKEOUTgti.net wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
>
>
>> Don't bet on it. If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
>> quickly. I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
>
> Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?

WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

On Aug 17, 6:28 pm, hk <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
> camacdonaldiii wrote:
> > On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK <intrcep....DeleteThis@123gmail.com> wrote:
> >> thun....DeleteThis@TAKEOUTgti.net wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
> >>>> Don't bet on it.  If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
> >>>> quickly.  I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
> >>> Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
> >> WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.
>
> > I'm posting under my own name.  So Harry has to prove his statements
> > accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
> > to do so.  If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
> > of a real person.
>
> Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
> the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
> what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
> the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
> you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.
>
> Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.

Your first communication from my sister and attorney, Harry, will be
via the deputy sheriff who will be serving you papers. If you try to
avoid service by getting crafty, then the responsibility will be
turned over to a private investigator/process server who will drop the
papers on you. Cheers, Dude.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause 

camacdonaldiii wrote:
> On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK <intrcep... DeleteThis @123gmail.com> wrote:
>> thun... DeleteThis @TAKEOUTgti.net wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
>>>> Don't bet on it. If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
>>>> quickly. I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
>>> Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
>> WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.
>
> I'm posting under my own name. So Harry has to prove his statements
> accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
> to do so. If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
> of a real person.


Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.

Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.
 >> Stay informed about: Good Morning Harry Krause