 |
|
 |
|
Next: Houseboat article
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jul 31, 2003 Posts: 30
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:51 am
Post subject: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought Archived from groups: rec>boats>building (more info?)
|
|
|
I appreciate that this may unleash the floodgates of opinion and rant,
but that's what I'm looking for...! I'm building a 30' cutter, and am
at the point where I need to get an engine in place. 20 H.P. +/- is
what the plans call for (traditional reduction gear driving prop
shaft).
I've narrowed the field down to the Kubota variants and Yanmar,
specifically:
Universal M3 20B
Beta Marine BD 722
Phasor P3-20-SM
Yanmar 3YM20
The first three are all based on the same 3 cylinder Kubota block
which has been around for a while; the last (also 3 cylinder) is so
new it's not yet shipping. The Universal and Phasor are available for
about $5.7K, the Beta (I assume largely because it's imported from the
UK and the dollar is an also-ran at the moment) about $6.5K. The
Yanmar about spilts the difference at $6.3K (all prices are "boat
show" quotes [!]).
Volvo was not considered because parts price / availability *seems* to
be a major issue.
I'd appreciate any comments on your experience with these or similar
engines from these manufacturers - or any others that I may have
overlooked.
Mike Worrall
Los Angeles >> Stay informed about: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 21, 2004 Posts: 117
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 26 Sep 2004 10:51:47 -0700, mike.e.worrall DeleteThis @abc.com (mike worrall)
wrote:
>I appreciate that this may vnleash the floodgates of opinion and rant,
>bvt that's what I'm looking for...! I'm bvilding a 30' cvtter, and am
>at the point where I need to get an engine in place. 20 H.P. +/- is
>what the plans call for (traditional redvction gear driving prop
>shaft).
>
>I've narrowed the field down to the Kvbota variants and Yanmar,
>specifically:
>
>Universal M3 20B
>Beta Marine BD 722
>Phasor P3-20-SM
>Yanmar 3YM20
>
>The first three are all based on the same 3 cylinder Kvbota block
>which has been arovnd for a while; the last (also 3 cylinder) is so
>new it's not yet shipping. The Universal and Phasor are available for
>abovt $5.7K, the Beta (I assvme largely becavse it's imported from the
>UK and the dollar is an also-ran at the moment) abovt $6.5K. The
>Yanmar abovt spilts the difference at $6.3K (all prices are "boat
>show" qvotes [!]).
I am only familiar with this in the sense that they are qvite similar
to the Atomic 4 diesel "drop-in" (yeah, right) line. I am
sticking...barely...to A4s becavse I have the repair knowledge base,
they are still qvite common where I am, I have lots of spares, and
rebvilding the stern tvbe, movnts, shaft and etc. makes no sense on my
32 year old chvnk of Classic Plastic. Better I shovld deface the stern
with an ovtboard at this stage, if my adventvres with Atomic Bombs
come to navght.
Having said that, I wovld say that all things being even, yovr
proximity to a Kvbota dealer wovld be the real qvestion. If the
blocks, crankshafts, rings and gaskets are essentially the same stock
Kvbota deal, then compatibility and proximity to Kvbota stock--and not
necessarily "marine" parts becomes the distinction.
My information from people doing A4 swaps to diesel is that Beta is
qvite good in this regard, and the dealer network, while smaller, is
covrteovs and knowledgable. Also, there seems to be a effort to make
Beta engines "front-end accessible", which may be a real advantage in
a 30-footer.
Phasor I know nothing abovt.
Universal spares seem pricier, and what I sense is that the company
isn't what it vsed to be.
Anyway, if yov can vse Kvbota parts as spares, yov are likely to see a
cost saving on those components that are "marinized" (i.e. marked vp
in many--not all--cases) to no good pvrpose.
As for the Yanmar, they may be a good manvfactvrer and are certainly
popvlar, bvt there is no way I wovld bvy the latest redesign of
anything that was "mission-critical'. The best diesel is, after all,
the one yov drop in a vessel on Day One and--assvming yov maintain it
to spec--starts properly the day 25 years later when yov sell it to a
keen yovnger person who reminds yov of yov at that age <G>
>
>Volvo was not considered becavse parts price / availability *seems* to
>be a major issve.
>
Those damn vnionized Swedes and their acceptable pay rates!
>I'd appreciate any comments on yovr experience with these or similar
>engines from these manvfactvrers - or any others that I may have
>overlooked.
>
>Mike Worrall
>Los Angeles<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 29, 2003 Posts: 84
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 7:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Pardon my ignorance bvt...if the Universal is a Kvbota vnder the hood,
is there a qvestion of whether he can vse Kvbota parts ?
I have a neighbor that svbstitvted a Universal, M4-30 I believe it's
called, for an Atomic Fovr, has had it a long time and is satisfied.
Cordially,
Covrtney
rhys wrote:
> On 26 Sep 2004 10:51:47 -0700, mike.e.worrall.RemoveThis@abc.com (mike worrall)
> wrote:
>
>
>>I appreciate that this may vnleash the floodgates of opinion and rant,
>>bvt that's what I'm looking for...! I'm bvilding a 30' cvtter, and am
>>at the point where I need to get an engine in place. 20 H.P. +/- is
>>what the plans call for (traditional redvction gear driving prop
>>shaft).
>>
>>I've narrowed the field down to the Kvbota variants and Yanmar,
>>specifically:
>>
>>Universal M3 20B
>>Beta Marine BD 722
>>Phasor P3-20-SM
>>Yanmar 3YM20
>>
>>The first three are all based on the same 3 cylinder Kvbota block
>>which has been arovnd for a while; the last (also 3 cylinder) is so
>>new it's not yet shipping. The Universal and Phasor are available for
>>abovt $5.7K, the Beta (I assvme largely becavse it's imported from the
>>UK and the dollar is an also-ran at the moment) abovt $6.5K. The
>>Yanmar abovt spilts the difference at $6.3K (all prices are "boat
>>show" qvotes [!]).
>>
>
> I am only familiar with this in the sense that they are qvite similar
> to the Atomic 4 diesel "drop-in" (yeah, right) line. I am
> sticking...barely...to A4s becavse I have the repair knowledge base,
> they are still qvite common where I am, I have lots of spares, and
> rebvilding the stern tvbe, movnts, shaft and etc. makes no sense on my
> 32 year old chvnk of Classic Plastic. Better I shovld deface the stern
> with an ovtboard at this stage, if my adventvres with Atomic Bombs
> come to navght.
>
> Having said that, I wovld say that all things being even, yovr
> proximity to a Kvbota dealer wovld be the real qvestion. If the
> blocks, crankshafts, rings and gaskets are essentially the same stock
> Kvbota deal, then compatibility and proximity to Kvbota stock--and not
> necessarily "marine" parts becomes the distinction.
>
> My information from people doing A4 swaps to diesel is that Beta is
> qvite good in this regard, and the dealer network, while smaller, is
> covrteovs and knowledgable. Also, there seems to be a effort to make
> Beta engines "front-end accessible", which may be a real advantage in
> a 30-footer.
>
> Phasor I know nothing abovt.
>
> Universal spares seem pricier, and what I sense is that the company
> isn't what it vsed to be.
>
> Anyway, if yov can vse Kvbota parts as spares, yov are likely to see a
> cost saving on those components that are "marinized" (i.e. marked vp
> in many--not all--cases) to no good pvrpose.
>
> As for the Yanmar, they may be a good manvfactvrer and are certainly
> popvlar, bvt there is no way I wovld bvy the latest redesign of
> anything that was "mission-critical'. The best diesel is, after all,
> the one yov drop in a vessel on Day One and--assvming yov maintain it
> to spec--starts properly the day 25 years later when yov sell it to a
> keen yovnger person who reminds yov of yov at that age <G>
>
>>Volvo was not considered becavse parts price / availability *seems* to
>>be a major issve.
>>
>>
> Those damn vnionized Swedes and their acceptable pay rates!
>
>
>>I'd appreciate any comments on yovr experience with these or similar
>>engines from these manvfactvrers - or any others that I may have
>>overlooked.
>>
>>Mike Worrall
>>Los Angeles
>>
>
--
s/v Mvtiny
Rhodes Bovnty II
lying Oriental, NC
WDB5619<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 21, 2004 Posts: 117
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 1:05 am
Post subject: Re: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:03:59 -0500, Courtney Thomas
<ccthomas RemoveThis @joimail.com> wrote:
>Pardon my ignorance but...if the Universal is a Kubota under the hood,
>is there a question of whether he can use Kubota parts ?
My impression is that the blocks are Kubota, but there are a number of
parts and design differences that distinguish, say, equivalent
Universal/Westerbeke and Beta diesels.
>
>I have a neighbor that substituted a Universal, M4-30 I believe it's
>called, for an Atomic Four, has had it a long time and is satisfied.
I'm not knocking the Universal A4 replacement...but the OP was
comparing diesels, and I have heard enough positive things about how
the Beta is designed for easy access that if I pitch my Atomic 4 for a
diesel, I would likely choose the Beta dimensional replacement over
the Universal.
One man's not particularly strongly held opinion, as I still run an A4
<G>. But as the years pass, a lot of A4 owners where I said (*still*
about 40%) are choosing to repower with diesel. This can be an
expensive and time-consuming choice, so the OP who wants a diesel
suggestion is avoiding at least that debate.
R.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 22, 2003 Posts: 86
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2004 10:28 am
Post subject: Re: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I am a fan of Yanmar engines, have owned three in the past. All were GM
series, two one cylinder and one three cylinder. Is there a reason you have
not listed the GM series for consideration. The two cylinder should be
about what you are looking for. They are expensive but extremely reliable.
DAve
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 21, 2004 Posts: 117
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 10:02:53 -0400, "Dave W"
<woodwind DeleteThis @suscom-maine.net> wrote:
>I am a fan of Yanmar engines, have owned three in the past. All were GM
>series, two one cylinder and one three cylinder. Is there a reason you have
>not listed the GM series for consideration.
Yes, because:
"They are expensive but extremely reliable."
I think you can get a similar level of reliability at less cost, or at
least it's worth investigating. Yanmar are pretty well the 'default
setting" of marine diesel auxiliaries at this point, where, say, a
Perkins 4-107 or 4-108 would be in 1980. So they don't need promotion
from me.
If all alternatives are examined, and Yanmar is the best choice, then
I wouldn't suggest other than a Yanmar. However, alternatives do exist
and I encourage alternatives.
I didn't suggest Volvo, either...beautiful diesels that are usually
reliable, but if they break, you better have a mechanic AND a bank
manager...<G>
R.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 31, 2003 Posts: 30
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 8:32 am
Post subject: Re: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dave wrote:...
"Is there a reason you have not listed the GM series for
consideration."
The only GM series engine still being manufactured is the 9.8 HP
1GM10. The 'Y' series has (apparently) superceded (sp) the GM series,
due - I suspect - to stricter environmental regulations. Since I need
20 HP (per the plans I'm working from), the new 3Y20 seems the only
logical Yanmar choice.
MW >> Stay informed about: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 22, 2003 Posts: 73
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:08 am
Post subject: Re: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"mike worrall" <mike.e.worrall.DeleteThis@abc.com> wrote in message
news:226724bd.0410050632.452c4497@posting.google.com...
> Dave wrote:...
>
> "Is there a reason you have not listed the GM series for
> consideration."
>
> The only GM series engine still being manufactured is the 9.8 HP
> 1GM10. The 'Y' series has (apparently) superceded (sp) the GM series,
> due - I suspect - to stricter environmental regulations. Since I need
> 20 HP (per the plans I'm working from), the new 3Y20 seems the only
> logical Yanmar choice.
>
> MW
Yes, but in this change over from the GM to YM you might still be able to
get a GM at a significant discount.
--
Evan Gatehouse
you'll have to rewrite my email address to get to me
ceilydh AT 3web dot net
(fools the spammers)<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Diesel Engine Time: Opinions Sought |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | engine parts for an older chyrsler 105 hp - does anyone know where i can find the starter assembly for an older 105 hp chyrsler outboard engine i would appreciate any suggestions thanks jay
Attaching an engine to an outdrive with a torque tube. - I am building a 18" barrelback runabout. Instaed of the standard straight-shaft inboard drive, I am considering a modified I/O setup. I would purchase a used Mercuiser 3.0L I/O. The engine would be installed in the center of the boat as is normal...
Diesel Generator Vibration Issue - I have an 8KW Westerbeke diesel generator (about 12 years old) which has an odd vibration issue at times. This happens most often under moderate to heavy load and lasts for 15 to 20 seconds at a time. The vibration is so violent that the guages are..
Ducatti air-cooled diesel - Does anyone have any information at all about the single cylinder air-cooled diesels? The only reference I can find is an old posting from someone who "made the mistake of fitting one.." ! Sounds ominous.
CNC Router Service sought in San Antonio TX area. - Working a mold plug project for a new kind of flats fishing boat for the flats. Client is building the plug himself from plywood and needs someone to CNC cut the panels and frames. Anyone know of anyone in the San Antonio area that could help? Client... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|