113 gallons per hour...

On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:35:52 -0500, HK <payer33859.DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:

>Yep.
>
>The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
>center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
>(67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>
>Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
>buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
>wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000 just for
>owning such a resource waster.
>
>Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the hole to
>the Saudi pigs.

Here is an even bigger way to get deeper into the hole. How much more
should those folks pay?

http://www.nice-ventures.com/blog/uploads/CARNIVAL-ECSTASY-CRUISE-SHIP.jpg
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

John H. wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:35:52 -0500, HK <payer33859 RemoveThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
>
>> Yep.
>>
>> The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
>> center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
>> (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>>
>> Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
>> buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
>> wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000 just for
>> owning such a resource waster.
>>
>> Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the hole to
>> the Saudi pigs.
>
> Here is an even bigger way to get deeper into the hole. How much more
> should those folks pay?
>
> http://www.nice-ventures.com/blog/uploads/CARNIVAL-ECSTASY-CRUISE-SHIP.jpg


That is one ugly ship. Looks like a wedding cake.
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:08:37 -0500, HK <payer33859.TakeThisOut@mypacks.net> wrote:

>John H. wrote:
>> On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:35:52 -0500, HK <payer33859.TakeThisOut@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Yep.
>>>
>>> The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
>>> center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
>>> (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>>>
>>> Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
>>> buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
>>> wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000 just for
>>> owning such a resource waster.
>>>
>>> Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the hole to
>>> the Saudi pigs.
>>
>> Here is an even bigger way to get deeper into the hole. How much more
>> should those folks pay?
>>
>> http://www.nice-ventures.com/blog/uploads/CARNIVAL-ECSTASY-CRUISE-SHIP.jpg
>
>
>That is one ugly ship. Looks like a wedding cake.

Once I figure out how to use Reggie's picture site, I'll post a picture of
a pretty ship.
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

On Nov 9, 2:35?pm, HK <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
> Yep.
>
> The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
> center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
> (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>
> Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
> buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
> wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000 just for
> owning such a resource waster.
>
> Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the hole to
> the Saudi pigs.

1nmpg isn't all that unusual for a 42-footer traveling at any sort of
speed. Heck you're lucky to do any better than 4nmpg in a single
screw, 7-knot, 42-foot trawler. And just like any other boat, fuel
consumption at WOT is almost obscene.

One man's fuel "wastage" is somebody elses' "gawd-given right to
recreate" and pursue the American dream.

At one time, Harry, you were very proud to own a Hatteras. That boat
had to burn one heck of a lot of fuel at any sort of speed. What
happened to change your attitude over the last 7-10 years?
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

>>That is one ugly ship. Looks like a wedding cake.<<

Maybe, but the food is good!

--Mike

"HK" <payer33859 RemoveThis @mypacks.net> wrote in message
news:d_2dnTyf1Y7ndananZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> John H. wrote:
>> On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:35:52 -0500, HK <payer33859 RemoveThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Yep.
>>>
>>> The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
>>> center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
>>> (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>>>
>>> Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
>>> buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
>>> wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000 just for
>>> owning such a resource waster.
>>>
>>> Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the hole to
>>> the Saudi pigs.
>>
>> Here is an even bigger way to get deeper into the hole. How much more
>> should those folks pay?
>>
>> http://www.nice-ventures.com/blog/uploads/CARNIVAL-ECSTASY-CRUISE-SHIP.jpg
>
>
> That is one ugly ship. Looks like a wedding cake.
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

>
> "HK" <payer33859.DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote in message
> news:d_2dnTyf1Y7ndananZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@comcast.com...

>> John H. wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is an even bigger way to get deeper into the hole. How much more
>>> should those folks pay?
>>>
>>> http://www.nice-ventures.com/blog/uploads/CARNIVAL-ECSTASY-CRUISE-SHIP.jpg
>>
>>
>> That is one ugly ship. Looks like a wedding cake.
>
>

Like some other brands, it is "purpose built".

Eisboch
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

John H. wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:08:37 -0500, HK <payer33859 DeleteThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
>
>> John H. wrote:
>>> On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:35:52 -0500, HK <payer33859 DeleteThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yep.
>>>>
>>>> The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
>>>> center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
>>>> (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>>>>
>>>> Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
>>>> buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
>>>> wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000 just for
>>>> owning such a resource waster.
>>>>
>>>> Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the hole to
>>>> the Saudi pigs.
>>> Here is an even bigger way to get deeper into the hole. How much more
>>> should those folks pay?
>>>
>>> http://www.nice-ventures.com/blog/uploads/CARNIVAL-ECSTASY-CRUISE-SHIP.jpg
>>
>> That is one ugly ship. Looks like a wedding cake.
>
> Once I figure out how to use Reggie's picture site, I'll post a picture of
> a pretty ship.

Download http://www.webshots.com/samplers/

Open a free account and easily upload the photos.
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

Chuck Gould wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2:35?pm, HK <payer33... RemoveThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
>> Yep.
>>
>> The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
>> center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
>> (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>>
>> Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
>> buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
>> wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000 just for
>> owning such a resource waster.
>>
>> Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the hole to
>> the Saudi pigs.
>
> 1nmpg isn't all that unusual for a 42-footer traveling at any sort of
> speed. Heck you're lucky to do any better than 4nmpg in a single
> screw, 7-knot, 42-foot trawler. And just like any other boat, fuel
> consumption at WOT is almost obscene.
>
> One man's fuel "wastage" is somebody elses' "gawd-given right to
> recreate" and pursue the American dream.
>
> At one time, Harry, you were very proud to own a Hatteras. That boat
> had to burn one heck of a lot of fuel at any sort of speed. What
> happened to change your attitude over the last 7-10 years?
>
>

I also remember when Harry was building his custom 36 ft'er, GPH or MPG
were not including in his criteria, speed to his fishing area was his
only criteria.

The trawler seems to be a great option for those who are spending a lot
of time boating and enjoy the experience of boating. Like life, it is
the journey not the destination.
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

Chuck Gould wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2:35?pm, HK <payer33....TakeThisOut@mypacks.net> wrote:
>> Yep.
>>
>> The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
>> center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
>> (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>>
>> Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
>> buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
>> wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000 just for
>> owning such a resource waster.
>>
>> Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the hole to
>> the Saudi pigs.
>
> 1nmpg isn't all that unusual for a 42-footer traveling at any sort of
> speed. Heck you're lucky to do any better than 4nmpg in a single
> screw, 7-knot, 42-foot trawler. And just like any other boat, fuel
> consumption at WOT is almost obscene.
>
> One man's fuel "wastage" is somebody elses' "gawd-given right to
> recreate" and pursue the American dream.
>
> At one time, Harry, you were very proud to own a Hatteras. That boat
> had to burn one heck of a lot of fuel at any sort of speed. What
> happened to change your attitude over the last 7-10 years?
>
>


What happened? You haven't read a newspaper or seen a TV news show in
the last 15 years?
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
> Chuck Gould wrote:
>> On Nov 9, 2:35?pm, HK <payer33....DeleteThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>> Yep.
>>>
>>> The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
>>> center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
>>> (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>>>
>>> Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
>>> buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
>>> wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000 just for
>>> owning such a resource waster.
>>>
>>> Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the hole to
>>> the Saudi pigs.
>>
>> 1nmpg isn't all that unusual for a 42-footer traveling at any sort of
>> speed. Heck you're lucky to do any better than 4nmpg in a single
>> screw, 7-knot, 42-foot trawler. And just like any other boat, fuel
>> consumption at WOT is almost obscene.
>>
>> One man's fuel "wastage" is somebody elses' "gawd-given right to
>> recreate" and pursue the American dream.
>>
>> At one time, Harry, you were very proud to own a Hatteras. That boat
>> had to burn one heck of a lot of fuel at any sort of speed. What
>> happened to change your attitude over the last 7-10 years?
>>
>>
>
> I also remember when Harry was building his custom 36 ft'er, GPH or MPG
> were not including in his criteria, speed to his fishing area was his
> only criteria.
>
> The trawler seems to be a great option for those who are spending a lot
> of time boating and enjoy the experience of boating. Like life, it is
> the journey not the destination.

Didn't he get a sweet heart deal on ULLICO or WorldCom stock that
enabled him to pay for his 36' Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat. I wonder why
he doesn't talk about it now?
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

BAR wrote:
> Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
>> Chuck Gould wrote:
>>> On Nov 9, 2:35?pm, HK <payer33....TakeThisOut@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>>> Yep.
>>>>
>>>> The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
>>>> center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
>>>> (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>>>>
>>>> Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
>>>> buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
>>>> wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000 just
>>>> for
>>>> owning such a resource waster.
>>>>
>>>> Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the hole to
>>>> the Saudi pigs.
>>>
>>> 1nmpg isn't all that unusual for a 42-footer traveling at any sort of
>>> speed. Heck you're lucky to do any better than 4nmpg in a single
>>> screw, 7-knot, 42-foot trawler. And just like any other boat, fuel
>>> consumption at WOT is almost obscene.
>>>
>>> One man's fuel "wastage" is somebody elses' "gawd-given right to
>>> recreate" and pursue the American dream.
>>>
>>> At one time, Harry, you were very proud to own a Hatteras. That boat
>>> had to burn one heck of a lot of fuel at any sort of speed. What
>>> happened to change your attitude over the last 7-10 years?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I also remember when Harry was building his custom 36 ft'er, GPH or
>> MPG were not including in his criteria, speed to his fishing area was
>> his only criteria.
>>
>> The trawler seems to be a great option for those who are spending a
>> lot of time boating and enjoy the experience of boating. Like life,
>> it is the journey not the destination.
>
> Didn't he get a sweet heart deal on ULLICO or WorldCom stock that
> enabled him to pay for his 36' Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat. I wonder why
> he doesn't talk about it now?
>


Wow...a circle jerk.
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

HK wrote:
> BAR wrote:
>> Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
>>> Chuck Gould wrote:
>>>> On Nov 9, 2:35?pm, HK <payer33... RemoveThis @mypacks.net> wrote:
>>>>> Yep.
>>>>>
>>>>> The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
>>>>> center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
>>>>> (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
>>>>> buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
>>>>> wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000
>>>>> just for
>>>>> owning such a resource waster.
>>>>>
>>>>> Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the
>>>>> hole to
>>>>> the Saudi pigs.
>>>>
>>>> 1nmpg isn't all that unusual for a 42-footer traveling at any sort of
>>>> speed. Heck you're lucky to do any better than 4nmpg in a single
>>>> screw, 7-knot, 42-foot trawler. And just like any other boat, fuel
>>>> consumption at WOT is almost obscene.
>>>>
>>>> One man's fuel "wastage" is somebody elses' "gawd-given right to
>>>> recreate" and pursue the American dream.
>>>>
>>>> At one time, Harry, you were very proud to own a Hatteras. That boat
>>>> had to burn one heck of a lot of fuel at any sort of speed. What
>>>> happened to change your attitude over the last 7-10 years?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I also remember when Harry was building his custom 36 ft'er, GPH or
>>> MPG were not including in his criteria, speed to his fishing area was
>>> his only criteria.
>>>
>>> The trawler seems to be a great option for those who are spending a
>>> lot of time boating and enjoy the experience of boating. Like life,
>>> it is the journey not the destination.
>>
>> Didn't he get a sweet heart deal on ULLICO or WorldCom stock that
>> enabled him to pay for his 36' Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat. I wonder
>> why he doesn't talk about it now?
>>
>
>
> Wow...a circle jerk.

Harry lies never die on Usenet even when you get all of your posts
deleted from Google. All of the responses are still there.

Do you want me to catalog your lies for you? This will enable you to say
yes it is still an active lie or it is one that you don't want to
perpetuate anymore.

What ever happened to the 36' Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat? Do you still
have it, have you sold it? Just what did you do with it.
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour... 

On Nov 10, 9:49 am, BAR <Screw....RemoveThis@Your.Place> wrote:
> HK wrote:
> > BAR wrote:
> >> Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
> >>> Chuck Gould wrote:
> >>>> On Nov 9, 2:35?pm, HK <payer33....RemoveThis@mypacks.net> wrote:
> >>>>> Yep.
>
> >>>>> The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin
> >>>>> center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT
> >>>>> (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise.
>
> >>>>> Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who
> >>>>> buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel
> >>>>> wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000
> >>>>> just for
> >>>>> owning such a resource waster.
>
> >>>>> Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the
> >>>>> hole to
> >>>>> the Saudi pigs.
>
> >>>> 1nmpg isn't all that unusual for a 42-footer traveling at any sort of
> >>>> speed. Heck you're lucky to do any better than 4nmpg in a single
> >>>> screw, 7-knot, 42-foot trawler. And just like any other boat, fuel
> >>>> consumption at WOT is almost obscene.
>
> >>>> One man's fuel "wastage" is somebody elses' "gawd-given right to
> >>>> recreate" and pursue the American dream.
>
> >>>> At one time, Harry, you were very proud to own a Hatteras. That boat
> >>>> had to burn one heck of a lot of fuel at any sort of speed. What
> >>>> happened to change your attitude over the last 7-10 years?
>
> >>> I also remember when Harry was building his custom 36 ft'er, GPH or
> >>> MPG were not including in his criteria, speed to his fishing area was
> >>> his only criteria.
>
> >>> The trawler seems to be a great option for those who are spending a
> >>> lot of time boating and enjoy the experience of boating. Like life,
> >>> it is the journey not the destination.
>
> >> Didn't he get a sweet heart deal on ULLICO or WorldCom stock that
> >> enabled him to pay for his 36' Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat. I wonder
> >> why he doesn't talk about it now?
>
> > Wow...a circle jerk.
>
> Harry lies never die on Usenet

Unfortunately neither do you, Fritz.
 >> Stay informed about: 113 gallons per hour...